|
Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
|
|
Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
In Reply to: One statistic that I have never heard reported ... posted by Quadzilla on April 16, 2021 at 09:11:59:
Here is a post from way back that has always stuck in my head regarding morons who bring up if only there had been more armed people they could have made it turn out differently. Yeah! More innocent dead people is almost guaranteed. If the 25% at best number of hits under fire are accurate for SWAT teams just what do you suppose some "tough" guy with an overactive imagination is going to have as opposed SWAT teams. This whole discussion has gotten really, really old and thoughts and prayers just don't cut it for this anymore.
"Decades back, I had a long conversation with an LAPD SWAT team member....
Posted by darkmoebius (A) on December 21, 2010 at 22:17:42
In Reply to: The statistics of real shootouts is very sobering posted by Victor Khomenko on December 21, 2010 at 19:56:25:
They were on my college campus for career day recruiting(even though SWAT doesn't recruit). I asked him what their accuracy rate was under fire, he said 25%, at best. Much less most of the time. He was dead serious. His view was that most discharge was really suppressive fire to degrade an attackers will to fight and buy time until overwhelming support arrives.
So, it seems to me, that hitting an attacker/intruder for the rest of us is more luck than skill."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- +1 Absolutely... - marcuslee841@yahoo.com 04/16/2110:13:24 04/16/21 (1)
- RE: +1 Absolutely... - pictureguy 16:25:01 04/19/21 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
