Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
In Reply to: RE: The numbers are in! posted by b.l.zeebub on September 10, 2020 at 08:10:09:
I watched the video. It's just highlights of a questionable study that was not peer reviewed.
Gov. Kristi Noem debunked its findings.
"This report isn't science; it's fiction. Under the guise of academic research, this report is nothing short of an attack on those who exercised their personal freedom to attend Sturgis," she said in a news release. "Predictably, some in the media breathlessly report on this non-peer reviewed model, built on incredibly faulty assumptions that do not reflect the actual facts and data here in South Dakota."
snip...
The number of cases estimated in the study differs significantly from the number of cases tied to the rally reported by the South Dakota Department of Health. As of Tuesday, the state reported 124 cases among South Dakota residents who got sick after attending the rally.
"The results do not align with what we know for the impacts of the rally," Clayton said Tuesday.
That discrepancy is because the state is identifying specific cases through contact tracing. The study takes a different approach.
-Rod
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: The numbers are in! - Rod M 09/10/2008:21:19 09/10/20 (27)
- RE: The numbers are in! - b.l.zeebub 10:04:09 09/10/20 (4)
- You're mixing different issues.... - Rod M 11:54:50 09/10/20 (1)
- RE: You're mixing different issues.... - rivervalley817 12:05:53 09/10/20 (0)
- RE: The numbers are in! - Sondek 10:36:09 09/10/20 (1)
- RE: The numbers are in! - b.l.zeebub 11:38:42 09/10/20 (0)
- Wow. It'd be very tough to find a reputable scientist/medical expert who..... - Rick W 09:52:59 09/10/20 (21)
- Critical thinking is in short supply there days.... - Rod M 11:45:28 09/10/20 (19)
- *Some* impact? - Rick W 13:50:23 09/10/20 (18)
- RE: *Some* impact? - Ed Schilling 14:04:26 09/10/20 (17)
- Yeah, but what about . . . - immatthewj 20:34:46 09/11/20 (3)
- RE: Yeah, but what about . . . - Dave B 11:42:21 09/12/20 (2)
- RE: Yeah, but what about . . . - rivervalley817 12:03:35 09/12/20 (1)
- RE: Yeah, but what about . . . - Ed Schilling 13:10:17 09/12/20 (0)
- In another time that'd be very funny. Now its just sad, not to mention your straw man. - Rick W 14:26:39 09/10/20 (1)
- RE: In another time that'd be very funny. Now its just sad, not to mention your straw man. - rivervalley817 14:47:03 09/10/20 (0)
- RE: *Some* impact? - rivervalley817 14:23:13 09/10/20 (5)
- RE: *Some* impact? - Ed Schilling 14:48:01 09/10/20 (4)
- "...by what model, the same ones used to "prove" "global warming"?" - b.l.zeebub 03:09:01 09/11/20 (0)
- RE: *Some* impact? - rivervalley817 15:23:16 09/10/20 (0)
- RE: *Some* impact? - Ed Schilling 15:11:21 09/10/20 (1)
- What exactly is the point of comparing a long planned party/get together (Sturgis)... - musetap 15:21:24 09/10/20 (0)
- RE: *Some* impact? - Ed Schilling 14:11:24 09/10/20 (4)
- You seem to have quite the chip on your shoulder next to your redneck... - musetap 15:13:44 09/10/20 (3)
- RE: You seem to have quite the chip on your shoulder next to your redneck... - Ed Schilling 15:24:12 09/10/20 (2)
- RE: You seem to have quite the chip on your shoulder next to your redneck... - Ed Schilling 18:42:24 09/10/20 (1)
- RE: You seem to have quite the chip on your shoulder next to your redneck... - Ed Schilling 18:57:06 09/10/20 (0)
- +1 nt - dee eye why 10:14:47 09/10/20 (0)