|
Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
|
|
Inmate Central Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome. |
|
In Reply to: It's not horseshit. They did laugh, and I have read. posted by ghost of olddude55 on October 23, 2023 at 06:25:36:
You keep parroting the common bullshit and trying to bamboozle by bringing other models into the picture. In reality the only strong point of T-34 was its quantity. They were awful for the crew, both in their comfort and survivability, had shorter range and they broke down like crazy. The later Sherman was better in every respect and hence used in their elite units. With their aux engine the crew could sleep in them during the winter. Their tracks made less noise miles away, and their well packed ammo was much easier to use than the grease covered ruSSian one. Plus, of course, their radios. Till the end of the war most ruSSian tanks didn't even have it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Then read some more - Victor Khomenko 10/23/2306:28:17 10/23/23 (5)
- Here is something for you - Victor Khomenko 07:10:33 10/23/23 (4)
- I have a pro-Sherman book... - ghost of olddude55 14:29:12 10/23/23 (3)
- It just doesn't get closer than this to overthrow your statement - Victor Khomenko 16:00:06 10/23/23 (2)
- BUT the T34 had one "best in class" feature - ltman 21:50:54 10/24/23 (1)
- No, you are not wrong, it definitely had some nice features - Victor Khomenko 06:23:50 10/25/23 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
