In Reply to: RE: high efficiency means more cut off of bottom end? posted by Inmate51 on April 9, 2019 at 09:18:26:
I saw it, unfortunately it's incorrect. No one yet has devised a way to make a cone as light as possible yet still give a low Fs.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: high efficiency means more cut off of bottom end? - Bill Fitzmaurice 04/9/1912:01:02 04/9/19 (8)
- RE: high efficiency means more cut off of bottom end? - lokie 10:23:55 04/10/19 (6)
- RE: high efficiency means more cut off of bottom end? - Bill Fitzmaurice 10:38:21 04/10/19 (5)
- RE: high efficiency means more cut off of bottom end? - Inmate51 04:16:26 04/11/19 (4)
- RE: high efficiency means more cut off of bottom end? - Bill Fitzmaurice 04:48:46 04/11/19 (3)
- RE: high efficiency means more cut off of bottom end? - claudej1@aol.com 09:10:54 04/11/19 (2)
- RE: high efficiency means more cut off of bottom end? - Bill Fitzmaurice 09:38:13 04/11/19 (1)
- Line Arrays - Inmate51 09:32:39 04/12/19 (0)
- The individual factors just do interact, don't they! - Timbo in Oz 15:07:04 04/9/19 (0)