In Reply to: RE: Monster Mash - Dippity Doo vs Dippity Don't (hornresp path function w. blh) posted by freddyi on March 11, 2019 at 12:43:45:
Fred, one problem with the first sim is the 0.0 pathway difference. That would put the cone and horn output in the same place. You'd only get that with a tapped horn. I saw some charts of early Danley THs and they did look a lot like that. It must have spooked some people, because since 2005 he's only shown up to 100-150Hz, below the dip frequency. There's nothing wrong with that, they aren't supposed to be used above that anyway, but it shows that sometimes you can divulge too much data to those who don't know how to interpret it.
Playing around in HornResp I get the same results as you do, but none of the other chart options show any difference when the distance is varied, so how this is supposed to be occurring isn't explained.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Monster Mash - Dippity Doo vs Dippity Don't (hornresp path function w. blh) - Bill Fitzmaurice 03/11/1914:28:10 03/11/19 (2)
- RE: Monster Mash - Dippity Doo vs Dippity Don't (hornresp path function w. blh) - freddyi 14:50:06 03/11/19 (1)
- RE: Monster Mash - Dippity Doo vs Dippity Don't (hornresp path function w. blh) - Bill Fitzmaurice 18:51:33 03/11/19 (0)