In Reply to: RE: Thanks - here are the parameters posted by John Sheerin on March 30, 2008 at 10:00:20:
Hi John,
Thanks a lot for the simulation, I really appreciate it! It looks great! However, the mouth of the horn will have to be somewhat smaller, since it cannot be to high if the high-mid horn and the treble horn should be there too. Thus, I can't go any larger than a mouth size of 3240 cm2 (90 cm wide x 36 cm high). On the other hand I can and will make use of all the other constructive suggestions you provide (smaller throat, longer horn, lower flare rate, larger compression chamber). Again, thanks a lot John!
Kind regards
Peter
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Thanks - here are the parameters - PK 03/30/0811:48:22 03/30/08 (6)
- RE: Thanks - here are the parameters - Bill Fitzmaurice 08:23:12 03/31/08 (5)
- Bill: One question regarding 'coax placement' - PK 13:16:48 03/31/08 (3)
- RE: Bill: One question regarding 'coax placement' - John Sheerin 18:16:31 03/31/08 (2)
- RE: Bill: One question regarding 'coax placement' - Bill Fitzmaurice 19:39:47 03/31/08 (1)
- RE: Bill: One question regarding 'coax placement' - PK 02:13:08 04/1/08 (0)
- RE: Thanks - here are the parameters - PK 11:54:55 03/31/08 (0)