In Reply to: RE: Horn experts - help needed to determine optimal throat size for low-mid horn posted by Bill Fitzmaurice on March 29, 2008 at 05:58:33:
Hi Bill,
I have tried messing around with different throat sizes, and by manipulating different parameters in Horn
Resp I can achieve quite good looking simulated responses with very different throat sizes (e.g. between 57 cm2 and 160 cm2).
However, I do not know wich range of throat sizes SOUND the best in a home environment (max efficiency is not the most important parameter).
I would very much like to hear which throat size you would take as a departure point if you were to make the horn, I am after.
Thanks a lot again Bill!
Kind regards
Peter
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yes, but good simulated responses can be achieved by very different throat sizes, so... - PK 03/29/0806:18:44 03/29/08 (22)
- RE: Yes, but good simulated responses can be achieved by very different throat sizes, so... - Saturntube 08:46:19 03/29/08 (1)
- RE: Yes, but good simulated responses can be achieved by very different throat sizes, so... - PK 02:40:58 03/30/08 (0)
- RE: Yes, but good simulated responses can be achieved by very different throat sizes, so... - Bill Fitzmaurice 07:37:24 03/29/08 (19)
- RE: Yes, but good simulated responses can be achieved by very different throat sizes, so... - PK 07:56:53 03/29/08 (18)
- RE: Yes, but good simulated responses can be achieved by very different throat sizes, so... - Bill Fitzmaurice 09:33:36 03/29/08 (1)
- RE: Yes, but good simulated responses can be achieved by very different throat sizes, so... - PK 02:38:06 03/30/08 (0)
- RE: Yes, but good simulated responses can be achieved by very different throat sizes, so... - John Sheerin 08:31:29 03/29/08 (15)
- RE: Yes, but good simulated responses can be achieved by very different throat sizes, so... - PK 08:54:16 03/29/08 (14)
- RE: Yes, but good simulated responses can be achieved by very different throat sizes, so... - John Sheerin 09:04:21 03/29/08 (13)
- Thanks - here are the parameters - PK 02:34:23 03/30/08 (12)
- RE: Thanks - here are the parameters - John Sheerin 10:00:20 03/30/08 (7)
- RE: Thanks - here are the parameters - PK 11:48:22 03/30/08 (6)
- RE: Thanks - here are the parameters - Bill Fitzmaurice 08:23:12 03/31/08 (5)
- Bill: One question regarding 'coax placement' - PK 13:16:48 03/31/08 (3)
- RE: Bill: One question regarding 'coax placement' - John Sheerin 18:16:31 03/31/08 (2)
- RE: Bill: One question regarding 'coax placement' - Bill Fitzmaurice 19:39:47 03/31/08 (1)
- RE: Bill: One question regarding 'coax placement' - PK 02:13:08 04/1/08 (0)
- RE: Thanks - here are the parameters - PK 11:54:55 03/31/08 (0)
- RE: Thanks - here are the parameters - Bill Fitzmaurice 07:01:07 03/30/08 (3)
- RE: Thanks - here are the parameters - PK 07:25:56 03/30/08 (0)
- RE: Thanks - here are the parameters - Walt 07:17:35 03/30/08 (1)
- RE: Thanks - here are the parameters - PK 10:02:39 03/30/08 (0)