In Reply to: Re: Hey Tom Dawson - here's non-optimized LC "boost" on K12 size posted by Tom Dawson on April 1, 2006 at 17:24:47:
re:Samson more stout output section would help - I push small things hard only tack 2 of Sheffield's Kodo CD has indced that ratcheting and mainly when only had 15mH choke vs 20mH.those dB figures are not calibrated but comparison can be drawn
tuning looks a bit high on this little box. I'd like to reduce the front chamber tuning and an added stub to front chamber should do it as have data with caps added to the 18 showing 3rd Z peak dropping as front chamber air mass is increased.
I treid added ALpha 6 as a midrange in a ~qtc=0.9 sealed box - ok little bit bland and 20uF highpass made Alpha 6 move as about as far as the woofer. that's not good practice to keep things clean. wonder waht passive network techique would keep mid-cone motion down to "invisable"/"unfeelable"?
K seem to produce lotsa noise with minimized cone excursion - you could probalby build a really kool K.
stock 1952 K15 might hold well against K-horn in ways. Carl sez his K15 equals or beats S9U
Freddy
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Hey Tom Dawson - here's non-optimized LC "boost" on K12 size - freddyi 04/1/0617:38:04 04/1/06 (4)
- Re: Hey Tom Dawson - here's non-optimized LC "boost" on K12 size - Tom Dawson 17:57:34 04/1/06 (3)
- Re: Hey Tom Dawson - here's non-optimized LC "boost" on K12 size - freddyi 18:09:37 04/1/06 (2)
- Re: Hey Tom Dawson - here's non-optimized LC "boost" on K12 size - Tom Dawson 18:23:20 04/1/06 (1)
- Re: Hey Tom Dawson - here's non-optimized LC "boost" on K12 size - freddyi 18:32:48 04/1/06 (0)