In Reply to: Errata posted by djk on May 11, 2003 at 18:44:11:
I stand corrected regarding the specifics of the Patents.
As for the midrange " gargle ", please be more specific ?
I kinda like the narrow vertical dispersion, I do tend to do most of my listening sitting down, and it seems to help imaging.
Hey, all speakers suffer from some sort of compromise.
I kinda like only one crossover point, but then I like the Quad 63, The Audire ribbons, some other full range, crossoverless speakers.
You may be sensitive to gargle, whatever that is, I am sensitive to the Phasiness of some multi driver speakers.
Yes, I am happy with them, and no, they arent the greatest thing since sliced bread, but they are fun.
I wish you could hear them truly bi amped with the Passive crossover removed, and a high order electronic crossover in its place.
Mine arent that way, YET, but they will be.
Please define gargle ???
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Errata - ka7niq 05/11/0321:17:40 05/11/03 (0)