In Reply to: Polar maps are great! posted by John Sheerin on January 27, 2006 at 15:46:54:
Yes, thats why I don't take anything serious where I have not seen the polar map.I do think that yours appears to have a lot of frequency averaging and I am not usually too concerned with the rear angles. The back hals is seldom interesting and it talks up a lot of space.
Earl Geddes
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Polar maps are great! - EGeddes 01/27/0618:13:49 01/27/06 (8)
- Re: Polar maps are great! - John Sheerin 18:18:57 01/27/06 (7)
- OK so what was - EGeddes 18:53:41 01/27/06 (6)
- Re: OK so what was - John Sheerin 06:45:04 01/28/06 (5)
- One more thing - EGeddes 07:19:58 01/28/06 (0)
- FEA vs BEM - EGeddes 07:12:59 01/28/06 (3)
- Re: FEA vs BEM - John Sheerin 07:47:41 01/28/06 (2)
- Re: FEA vs BEM - EGeddes 08:44:52 01/28/06 (1)
- Re: FEA vs BEM vs "what do I want" - freddyi 12:13:46 01/28/06 (0)