In Reply to: Re: Unos, Duos, Trios posted by Steven R. Rochlin on November 11, 2000 at 03:19:56:
The "tailorability" of these speakers is great, isn't it? Here you’re trying to reduce the vertical stretching by angling the midrange horns downward, whereas I actually like them better when the imaging is stretched out a bit. Precise imaging can seem a little too “hi-fi†to me. For example, it bugs me when people complain about "10-foot keyboards" and the like. If you go to a recital and close your eyes, a piano really does sound like it's 10-feet wide and hanging about 15 feet in the air. To me, it’s a warning sign if I put on a record and can point to the exact location of each instrument.["Maybe i need to do more research on the Trios, but then again my bank book simply has its limits, too, and i have other hobbies such as medium format photography and collecting timepieces so..."]
What is it about cameras, watches, and audio? I just picked up a Rolleiflex 3.5F yesterday.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Unos, Duos, Trios - Mr. Walker 11/11/0010:09:14 11/11/00 (3)
- Re: Unos, Duos, Trios - Steven R. Rochlin 15:23:20 11/11/00 (2)
- How do the Unos, Dous stack up.... - Mike Bates 18:58:44 11/11/00 (1)
- Re: How do the Unos, Dous stack up.... - Steven R. Rochlin 20:49:01 11/11/00 (0)