Home High Efficiency Speaker Asylum

Need speakers that can rock with just one watt? You found da place.

Re: Wave shape

There's no way for you to put spin on this and make it appear any different than it is.

First, I'll reply about the mechanical mass/suspension loading issue that you keep saying I'm "evading." I've responded to you several times, with two of the more succinct explainations, here and here . This isn't about my being "evasive." It's about you trying to say that I am, which is one of your manipulative tactics. I have not avoided the issue at all and , in fact, it was my choice to enter into the conversation and challenge your oversimplifications.

I just don't keep repeating myself as you have been. What I have to say has already been said.

Second, I'll say a few more things about your false claims of "threatening letters."

You and John Hancock are the guilty ones here. You both had repeatedly insulted me, accusing me of spoofing IP's and writing under an alias, even when the administrator of the forum told you he had proof in the system logs that this wasn't the case. Still, you and John continued to attack me, even when I did not participate in the conversation at all.

Your comments had begun to take the tone of harassment and "cyber-stalking," which is why I wrote you the letter asking you to refrain . Shortly thereafter, I received a letter from John, which I forwarded to you. I've included a copy of his letter, and of my reply to him below.

You then proceeded to pretend as though you had been a victim of lawsuit threats , hoping to sway public opinion and gain sympathy. You made misleading comments intending to make yourself look like the faultless victim of intimidation and frivolous litigation. And it did appear to have an impact at that time, because you got a lot of "support."

You can't claim to have misunderstood the issue; The only reasonable explaination is that you wanted to stage a scene and to manipulate public opinion. If you honestly felt you had been threatened with libel suit, you would never have come here and acted this way. And it's not the first time you've acted like this. From what I've seen from you, it's your normal mode of behavior.

Anyway, below you'll find a copy of the letter that Hancock sent, followed by my response. It is easy to see that it is not addressed to you, and I am certain that neither you nor your counsel or co-workers misunderstood this fact. You simply wanted to fabricate a story to manipulate public opinion.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Monica Melo"
To: "Pi Speakers"
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 5:38 PM
Subject: sock puppets

>
>
> Alright Wayne, I've just about had it with your sock puppeting.
> Keep it up and you'll see a very thorough and very public analysis
> of your speakers with detailed measurements. You and I both know
> your speaker "designs" can't stand up to scrutiny. In the interests
> of peace, I've been keeping quiet while you foist those travesties
> off on suckers who don't know any better, but if you're going to
> behave like this, people are going to know exactly what they have
> been buying. One more sockpuppet and my order goes out to eminence.
>
> John
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>

This is my reply to John later that same day, which was copied to you, Rod Morris, Mike Baker and Bill Martinelli. Several other people have seen these letters as well, and not a single person has misunderstood the issues or confused the recipients.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pi Speakers"
To: "Monica Melo"
Cc: "Mike Baker"; "Tom Danley"; "Rod Morris"; "Bill Martinelli"
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:46 PM
Subject: Correspondence between John Hancock and Wayne Parham

> Hello John,
>
> Please feel free to do whatever you want, including building
> speakers from my designs and measuring them. I've been pleased
> with them, and so have many others. They are academically sound
> designs, both from a mathematical perspective and also as measured.
> So please do feel free to build them. I sent you the plans a long
> time ago, when you requested them under a bogus name. You didn't
> need to do that. I would have sent them to you anyway.
>
> But as for your rudeness in public, I've spoken to Rod Morris about
> your misconduct on the Audio Asylum. This letter is forwarded to
> him as well. I should probably consider speaking to my attorney
> about taking this matter to court about the things you've said.
> Without having measurements made by someone less biased than yourself,
> the comments you've made are things I could probably get damage
> awards for. Same for the personal attacks.
>
> You speak of doing something in the interest of peace. That's
> ridiculous. There is little I can see from you that has been
> peaceful. If you really wanted to be "peaceful," it would be
> fairly easy to do. A simple absense of malice is peaceful. What
> you do has not ever been in the interest of peace.
>
> My designs are well considered designs, and I don't deserve your
> disrespectful comments. So please do build them and measure them.
> But have your measurements verified by someone that is qualified
> and impartial.
>
> Wayne Parham


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Sonic Craft  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.