In Reply to: Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover posted by Don M on May 23, 2005 at 18:27:51:
Hi -The series element would be a similar value to that of a first order xover (capacitor in this case), but with a slightly increased value to compensate for the initial notch attenuation. What would be added is a series LC network across the driver vc (as you probably suspected) to produce the actual null.
Usually, I try to keep the null an octave to two octaves below the nominal -3db point - there's no problem with going a bit closer except that with this kind of filter, the response will recover to a somewhat higher amplitude in the 100 - 150 hz range (perhaps going slightly above -20 db depending on notch width) before going into its final rolloff. Even with a notch at 400 instead of 479, the notch should still contribute 12-20 db attenuation over a straight first order at 479 hz.
I use this type of xover for all the 2 way designs I've done for a while because it acts like a first order near xover but gives a stopband rolloff beyond half an octave into the stopband like a second to fourth order xover (depending on exact notch characteristics). It doesn't perfectly emulate a first order at Fxover, but the db or two or 10 or 20 degrees of phase angle deviation
are minor compared to its advantages, IMO.When I was designing the horn xover for the Iron Lawbreakers running with the 2220J woofer, where I have a 288-16G driving a flat front horn with a nominal 400hz cutoff (xover at 550 hz), I was using this type of filter (with series 20 ohm attenuating resistor) with 10uF series and 100uF/10mH shunt (centered around 150 hz), as well as a mild HF boost network. Playing at an average level of significantly less than a watt into the 288G, I experimentally tried removing the shunt networks from both channels, effectively converting the xover to a straight first order with a 3db point of maybe 450hz. The change in frequency response and driver integration at the listening seat was minor, but there was a dramatic increase in audible distortion and a significant deterioration in image stability from the 288G's that had me rushing to put the shunt network back in.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - Tom Dawson 05/24/0508:45:50 05/24/05 (12)
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - - 1K5 values? - freddyi 09:46:33 05/25/05 (11)
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - - 1K5 values? - Tom Dawson 12:42:22 05/25/05 (10)
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - - 1K5 values? - higher order highpass? notch width? - freddyi 20:55:53 05/26/05 (7)
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - - 1K5 values? - higher order highpass? notch width? - freddyi 19:27:04 05/28/05 (5)
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - - 1K5 values? - higher order highpass? notch width? - Tom Dawson 21:01:25 05/28/05 (4)
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - - 1K5 values? - higher order highpass? notch width? - freddyi 09:40:42 05/29/05 (3)
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - - 1K5 values? - higher order highpass? notch width? - Tom Dawson 22:09:42 05/29/05 (2)
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - - 1K5 values? - higher order highpass? notch width? - freddyi 11:43:45 05/30/05 (1)
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - - 1K5 values? - higher order highpass? notch width? - Tom Dawson 08:02:32 06/1/05 (0)
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - - 1K5 values? - higher order highpass? notch width? - Tom Dawson 16:18:38 05/28/05 (0)
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - - 1K5 values? - Don M 15:47:43 05/25/05 (1)
- Re: Altec 806A - First Order Crossover - - 1K5 values? - Tom Dawson 11:54:52 05/26/05 (0)