In Reply to: Yep posted by smallpond on May 12, 2003 at 19:44:25:
I don't know about all the studies, but our trials went like this.
Like I said, the PHY TL / Azura test was crude, but it indicated what front load horns do. They increase the efficiency of the driver by about 3 db over the direct radiator function. That leaves an obvious lag in the LF.Our latest work involves a Fostex 168 driver. We have it in a BL horn and in a FL horn...the Big Beast.
First of all, we use a compression chamber behind the driver in the FL horn, which would obviate the use of a BL horn, but more to the point, this arrangement boosts the eff by about 6 db over normal direct or BL horn use. We have it in a tandem use with a 100db ribbon and they match very well.
In the BL horn, this driver will operate at about 96 - 98db eff at best. That is a clear attenuation of the BW. What's more, I don't know how the removal of the compression chamber would further effect the overall response. My guess is that it would lower the FW eff a little [maybe 1/2], but it could also goof with the response itself, since the chamber is mechanically damping and smoothing out the driver's response.
For my money, I will pursue a different path to solve this puzzle. I think that once you get the primary driver to respond below 100hz [in the front horn] you can use a subwoofer of some sort. All the rest is relatively easy, but BL/ FL horns are a difficult [at best] proposition, and will yield questionable results, IMO.
What about a PP FL bass horn. Anybody?
Thanks for the pics.
Later
D
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re:Here's the thing... - Dave-A 05/14/0307:22:20 05/14/03 (0)