In Reply to: Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim posted by dwiggins@adireaudio.com on July 5, 2002 at 08:54:53:
Hi Dan!You wrote:
> > Well, I know what horn theory says, but I also have had a chance
> > to listen to some of these units (TD-1s) and it does work. Also,
> > measurements don't lie - I'm sure Tom and all would be willing to
> > measure a set for someone and show that it works.For several months, measurements of a licensed Unity device were displayed that clearly indicated the fact that there was a frequency anomaly.
> > To me, this says that the horn theory that is documented and
> > published so much about is either wrong (which I don't believe;
> > too strong a correlation between the theory predictions and
> > measured results) or it is a specialized case (where it doesn't
> > consider the effects of drivers mounted partially down the horn,
> > and not at the throat, and the fact they are operating over a
> > narrow bandwidth of the entire horn).Either that or the horn is not, in fact, acoustically loading the diaphragms. Efficiency would be greater if it were.
> > So, having heard the results, and having seen the measurements,
> > I'd have to say the horn does work.Thanks for your objective evaluation.
Take care!
Wayne Parham
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Unity Patent - str8aro 17:56:37 06/26/02 (170)
- horn stuff and a final post to Wayne - tomservo 11:03:52 07/7/02 (38)
- UHF - Wayne Parham 23:24:57 07/13/02 (0)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Wayne Parham 05:59:21 07/13/02 (14)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - tomservo 19:35:32 07/14/02 (11)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Wayne Parham 22:24:55 07/14/02 (10)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - tomservo 09:31:27 07/15/02 (9)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - hancock 16:40:52 07/15/02 (2)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - tomservo 18:18:21 07/15/02 (1)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - hancock 14:53:22 07/16/02 (0)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Wayne Parham 16:33:51 07/15/02 (4)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Mark Seaton 16:36:58 07/16/02 (1)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Wayne Parham 17:28:52 07/16/02 (0)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - tomservo 18:15:21 07/15/02 (1)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Wayne Parham 15:31:16 07/16/02 (0)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - hancock 15:20:31 07/13/02 (1)
- Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Wayne Parham 23:23:04 07/13/02 (0)
- Re: horn stuff and a final post to Wayne - hancock 14:35:52 07/7/02 (0)
- Horn stuff and a final post to Tom - Wayne Parham 14:03:40 07/7/02 (19)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post to Wayne - tomservo 16:28:38 07/7/02 (18)
- Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 19:07:49 07/7/02 (16)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - tomservo 21:07:05 07/7/02 (15)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 02:21:20 07/8/02 (14)
- LAB Bass Horn project - Mark Seaton 13:24:52 07/9/02 (1)
- Re: LAB Bass Horn project - Wayne Parham 17:28:10 07/9/02 (0)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - tomservo 13:19:08 07/9/02 (7)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 17:19:42 07/9/02 (6)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - tomservo 19:07:54 07/9/02 (5)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 01:30:58 07/10/02 (4)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - tomservo 07:41:22 07/10/02 (3)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 15:13:49 07/10/02 (2)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - tomservo 19:32:50 07/10/02 (1)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 23:31:48 07/11/02 (0)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Mark Seaton 12:53:43 07/9/02 (1)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 16:47:53 07/9/02 (0)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - citroeniste 12:03:14 07/9/02 (1)
- Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 12:39:52 07/9/02 (0)
- Congrats! - sunnysal 12:54:51 07/1/02 (0)
- JBL line source - hancock 23:36:01 06/28/02 (1)
- Re: JBL line source - Mark Seaton 20:03:23 06/29/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 05:37:22 06/27/02 (119)
- Re: Unity Patent - Paul Butterfield 06:18:57 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 06:14:18 06/27/02 (117)
- Re: Unity Patent - Wayne Parham 19:47:15 07/14/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - Mark Seaton 10:20:57 06/27/02 (115)
- Re: Unity Patent - hancock 13:47:24 06/28/02 (0)
- Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:56:49 06/27/02 (96)
- Re: Patentable claim - larry moore 08:26:07 07/1/02 (1)
- Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:08:29 07/1/02 (0)
- Re: Patentable claim - hancock 23:34:36 06/28/02 (0)
- Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 10:39:50 06/28/02 (92)
- Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:47:47 06/28/02 (91)
- Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 14:03:23 06/28/02 (90)
- quarter wave resonance? - Tom Dawson 11:47:26 07/1/02 (4)
- Re: quarter wave resonance? - hancock 11:47:42 07/4/02 (3)
- Re: quarter wave resonance? - Wayne Parham 15:03:07 07/4/02 (2)
- Re: quarter wave resonance? - Mark Seaton 12:47:29 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: quarter wave resonance? - Wayne Parham 16:16:14 07/5/02 (0)
- Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:13:51 06/28/02 (82)
- Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 09:10:20 06/29/02 (81)
- flawwed logic - Sam P. 17:50:08 06/29/02 (2)
- Re: flawwed logic - hancock 01:27:18 06/30/02 (0)
- Re: flawed examination - Mark Seaton 19:58:22 06/29/02 (0)
- Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:46:54 06/29/02 (77)
- From Tom Danley - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 10:17:35 07/2/02 (76)
- Re: From Tom Danley - Re: Patentable claim - Tom Dawson 09:57:22 07/3/02 (0)
- From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:41:48 07/2/02 (74)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:29:29 07/3/02 (56)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:40:11 07/3/02 (52)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 11:50:41 07/4/02 (47)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:23:45 07/4/02 (46)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 16:48:59 07/4/02 (45)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:49:49 07/4/02 (44)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 10:45:57 07/5/02 (14)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:10:52 07/5/02 (13)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 14:49:43 07/5/02 (12)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - str8aro 19:49:25 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 00:01:03 07/6/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:28:43 07/5/02 (9)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 16:21:49 07/6/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:08:32 07/7/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 09:00:14 07/6/02 (6)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:23:07 07/6/02 (4)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 18:26:34 07/6/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 01:39:22 07/7/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 16:55:53 07/6/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:46:26 07/7/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 03:20:37 07/5/02 (29)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:38:48 07/5/02 (28)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 13:39:56 07/5/02 (5)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 14:07:08 07/5/02 (4)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 14:19:15 07/5/02 (3)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:47:03 07/5/02 (2)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 13:28:59 07/6/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:09:45 07/6/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:35:47 07/5/02 (21)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:49:15 07/5/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 14:14:09 07/5/02 (19)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:55:31 07/5/02 (18)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 09:18:20 07/6/02 (8)
- Change your mind again? - Wayne Parham 23:10:09 07/14/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:05:37 07/6/02 (6)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 08:42:59 07/7/02 (5)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:01:00 07/8/02 (4)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 04:28:53 07/8/02 (3)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 12:45:35 07/8/02 (2)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 14:28:22 07/8/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:37:21 07/8/02 (0)
- hard not to remember "the king of comb filtering"(nt) - Sam P. 07:10:54 07/6/02 (8)
- Re: LOL - Magnetar 09:21:07 07/6/02 (7)
- Misconceptions - Mark Seaton 10:34:57 07/4/02 (1)
- Re: Misconceptions Department of redundancy Department - tomservo 12:01:42 07/4/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 09:58:37 07/4/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:41:04 07/4/02 (0)
- LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - Sam P. 15:10:57 07/3/02 (2)
- Re: LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - hancock 08:39:22 07/4/02 (1)
- Re: LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - Wayne Parham 14:39:54 07/4/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 08:24:59 07/3/02 (16)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:41:39 07/3/02 (15)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 17:39:04 07/3/02 (14)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 22:24:00 07/3/02 (13)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - DanWiggins 08:09:31 07/4/02 (12)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 09:57:06 07/4/02 (11)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 13:03:15 07/4/02 (10)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 22:53:34 07/4/02 (7)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 01:34:40 07/5/02 (6)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 12:08:51 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:59:24 07/5/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 08:54:53 07/5/02 (3)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 07/5/0211:23:20 07/5/02 (2)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:47:11 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:09:41 07/5/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Andre Jute 13:59:04 07/4/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:41:47 07/4/02 (0)
- How do I model 4 midrange drivers as 1 at the point where they enter the horn? - TimgG 14:30:55 06/28/02 (1)
- Re: How do I model 4 midrange drivers as 1 at the point where they enter the horn? - str8aro 17:42:35 06/28/02 (0)
- Bring em - Kevin P 11:55:55 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 10:34:25 06/27/02 (15)
- Re: Unity Patent - Kevin P 11:52:40 06/27/02 (5)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 12:31:01 06/27/02 (4)
- Re: Transport - Tim Moorman 15:03:34 06/27/02 (3)
- Re: Transport - str8aro 19:20:10 06/27/02 (2)
- Re: Transport--As in F250 Ford Pick em Up and/or... - Tim Moorman 14:13:23 06/29/02 (1)
- Re: Transport--As in F250 Ford Pick em Up and/or... - str8aro 16:35:16 06/29/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 11:40:31 06/27/02 (8)
- Re: Unity Patent - Bill Wassilak 12:45:34 06/27/02 (7)
- Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 13:01:50 06/27/02 (1)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 13:28:35 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 12:52:49 06/27/02 (4)
- Re: Unity Patent - Magnetar 05:53:12 06/28/02 (1)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 21:36:29 06/28/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - Paul Butterfield 15:09:37 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 13:03:52 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - djk 00:46:54 06/27/02 (6)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 05:17:19 06/27/02 (5)
- Time Limits - djk 02:18:47 06/28/02 (0)
- Is there a way to print these images? - TimG 08:53:20 06/27/02 (3)
- AlternaTiff... - darkmoebius 19:58:32 07/7/02 (0)
- Re: Is there a way to print these images? - Tim Moorman 13:56:47 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Is there a way to print these images? - str8aro 09:01:51 06/27/02 (0)
Follow Ups
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 07/5/0211:23:20 07/5/02 (2)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:47:11 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:09:41 07/5/02 (0)