Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham - High Efficiency Speaker Asylum

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Unity Patent - str8aro 17:56:37 06/26/02 (170)

horn stuff and a final post to Wayne - tomservo 11:03:52 07/7/02 (38)

UHF - Wayne Parham 23:24:57 07/13/02 (0)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Wayne Parham 05:59:21 07/13/02 (14)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - tomservo 19:35:32 07/14/02 (11)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Wayne Parham 22:24:55 07/14/02 (10)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - tomservo 09:31:27 07/15/02 (9)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - hancock 16:40:52 07/15/02 (2)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - tomservo 18:18:21 07/15/02 (1)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - hancock 14:53:22 07/16/02 (0)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Wayne Parham 16:33:51 07/15/02 (4)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Mark Seaton 16:36:58 07/16/02 (1)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Wayne Parham 17:28:52 07/16/02 (0)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - tomservo 18:15:21 07/15/02 (1)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Wayne Parham 15:31:16 07/16/02 (0)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - hancock 15:20:31 07/13/02 (1)

Re: horn stuff and final conclusions - Wayne Parham 23:23:04 07/13/02 (0)

Re: horn stuff and a final post to Wayne - hancock 14:35:52 07/7/02 (0)

Horn stuff and a final post to Tom - Wayne Parham 14:03:40 07/7/02 (19)

Re: Horn stuff and a post to Wayne - tomservo 16:28:38 07/7/02 (18)

Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 19:07:49 07/7/02 (16)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - tomservo 21:07:05 07/7/02 (15)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 02:21:20 07/8/02 (14)

LAB Bass Horn project - Mark Seaton 13:24:52 07/9/02 (1)

Re: LAB Bass Horn project - Wayne Parham 17:28:10 07/9/02 (0)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - tomservo 13:19:08 07/9/02 (7)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 17:19:42 07/9/02 (6)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - tomservo 19:07:54 07/9/02 (5)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 01:30:58 07/10/02 (4)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - tomservo 07:41:22 07/10/02 (3)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 15:13:49 07/10/02 (2)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - tomservo 19:32:50 07/10/02 (1)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 23:31:48 07/11/02 (0)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Mark Seaton 12:53:43 07/9/02 (1)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 16:47:53 07/9/02 (0)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - citroeniste 12:03:14 07/9/02 (1)

Re: Horn stuff and a post back for Tom - Wayne Parham 12:39:52 07/9/02 (0)

Congrats! - sunnysal 12:54:51 07/1/02 (0)

JBL line source - hancock 23:36:01 06/28/02 (1)

Re: JBL line source - Mark Seaton 20:03:23 06/29/02 (0)

Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 05:37:22 06/27/02 (119)

Re: Unity Patent - Paul Butterfield 06:18:57 06/27/02 (0)

Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 06:14:18 06/27/02 (117)

Re: Unity Patent - Wayne Parham 19:47:15 07/14/02 (0)

Re: Unity Patent - Mark Seaton 10:20:57 06/27/02 (115)

Re: Unity Patent - hancock 13:47:24 06/28/02 (0)

Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:56:49 06/27/02 (96)

Re: Patentable claim - larry moore 08:26:07 07/1/02 (1)

Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:08:29 07/1/02 (0)

Re: Patentable claim - hancock 23:34:36 06/28/02 (0)

Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 10:39:50 06/28/02 (92)

Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:47:47 06/28/02 (91)

Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 14:03:23 06/28/02 (90)

quarter wave resonance? - Tom Dawson 11:47:26 07/1/02 (4)

Re: quarter wave resonance? - hancock 11:47:42 07/4/02 (3)

Re: quarter wave resonance? - Wayne Parham 15:03:07 07/4/02 (2)

Re: quarter wave resonance? - Mark Seaton 12:47:29 07/5/02 (1)

Re: quarter wave resonance? - Wayne Parham 16:16:14 07/5/02 (0)

Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:13:51 06/28/02 (82)

Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 09:10:20 06/29/02 (81)

flawwed logic - Sam P. 17:50:08 06/29/02 (2)

Re: flawwed logic - hancock 01:27:18 06/30/02 (0)

Re: flawed examination - Mark Seaton 19:58:22 06/29/02 (0)

Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 06/29/0211:46:54 06/29/02 (77)

From Tom Danley - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 10:17:35 07/2/02 (76)

Re: From Tom Danley - Re: Patentable claim - Tom Dawson 09:57:22 07/3/02 (0)

From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:41:48 07/2/02 (74)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:29:29 07/3/02 (56)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:40:11 07/3/02 (52)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 11:50:41 07/4/02 (47)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:23:45 07/4/02 (46)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 16:48:59 07/4/02 (45)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:49:49 07/4/02 (44)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 10:45:57 07/5/02 (14)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:10:52 07/5/02 (13)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 14:49:43 07/5/02 (12)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - str8aro 19:49:25 07/5/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 00:01:03 07/6/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:28:43 07/5/02 (9)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 16:21:49 07/6/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:08:32 07/7/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 09:00:14 07/6/02 (6)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:23:07 07/6/02 (4)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 18:26:34 07/6/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 01:39:22 07/7/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 16:55:53 07/6/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:46:26 07/7/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 03:20:37 07/5/02 (29)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:38:48 07/5/02 (28)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 13:39:56 07/5/02 (5)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 14:07:08 07/5/02 (4)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 14:19:15 07/5/02 (3)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:47:03 07/5/02 (2)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 13:28:59 07/6/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:09:45 07/6/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:35:47 07/5/02 (21)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:49:15 07/5/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 14:14:09 07/5/02 (19)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:55:31 07/5/02 (18)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 09:18:20 07/6/02 (8)

Change your mind again? - Wayne Parham 23:10:09 07/14/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:05:37 07/6/02 (6)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 08:42:59 07/7/02 (5)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:01:00 07/8/02 (4)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 04:28:53 07/8/02 (3)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 12:45:35 07/8/02 (2)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 14:28:22 07/8/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:37:21 07/8/02 (0)

hard not to remember "the king of comb filtering"(nt) - Sam P. 07:10:54 07/6/02 (8)

Re: LOL - Magnetar 09:21:07 07/6/02 (7)

Re: LOL - Wayne Parham 14:04:14 07/6/02 (6)

Re: LOL - hancock 08:19:12 07/7/02 (5)

Re: LOL - Wayne Parham 12:47:15 07/7/02 (4)

Re: LOL - hancock 14:28:01 07/7/02 (3)

Re: LOL - Wayne Parham 14:54:45 07/7/02 (2)

Re: LOL - hancock 15:01:17 07/7/02 (1)

Re: LOL - Wayne Parham 15:29:09 07/7/02 (0)

Misconceptions - Mark Seaton 10:34:57 07/4/02 (1)

Re: Misconceptions Department of redundancy Department - tomservo 12:01:42 07/4/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 09:58:37 07/4/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:41:04 07/4/02 (0)

LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - Sam P. 15:10:57 07/3/02 (2)

Re: LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - hancock 08:39:22 07/4/02 (1)

Re: LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - Wayne Parham 14:39:54 07/4/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 08:24:59 07/3/02 (16)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:41:39 07/3/02 (15)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 17:39:04 07/3/02 (14)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 22:24:00 07/3/02 (13)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - DanWiggins 08:09:31 07/4/02 (12)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 09:57:06 07/4/02 (11)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 13:03:15 07/4/02 (10)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 22:53:34 07/4/02 (7)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 01:34:40 07/5/02 (6)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 12:08:51 07/5/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:59:24 07/5/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 08:54:53 07/5/02 (3)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:23:20 07/5/02 (2)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:47:11 07/5/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:09:41 07/5/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Andre Jute 13:59:04 07/4/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:41:47 07/4/02 (0)

How do I model 4 midrange drivers as 1 at the point where they enter the horn? - TimgG 14:30:55 06/28/02 (1)

Re: How do I model 4 midrange drivers as 1 at the point where they enter the horn? - str8aro 17:42:35 06/28/02 (0)

Bring em - Kevin P 11:55:55 06/27/02 (0)

Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 10:34:25 06/27/02 (15)

Re: Unity Patent - Kevin P 11:52:40 06/27/02 (5)

Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 12:31:01 06/27/02 (4)

Re: Transport - Tim Moorman 15:03:34 06/27/02 (3)

Re: Transport - str8aro 19:20:10 06/27/02 (2)

Re: Transport--As in F250 Ford Pick em Up and/or... - Tim Moorman 14:13:23 06/29/02 (1)

Re: Transport--As in F250 Ford Pick em Up and/or... - str8aro 16:35:16 06/29/02 (0)

Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 11:40:31 06/27/02 (8)

Re: Unity Patent - Bill Wassilak 12:45:34 06/27/02 (7)

Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 13:01:50 06/27/02 (1)

Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 13:28:35 06/27/02 (0)

Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 12:52:49 06/27/02 (4)

Re: Unity Patent - Magnetar 05:53:12 06/28/02 (1)

Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 21:36:29 06/28/02 (0)

Re: Unity Patent - Paul Butterfield 15:09:37 06/27/02 (0)

Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 13:03:52 06/27/02 (0)

Re: Unity Patent - djk 00:46:54 06/27/02 (6)

Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 05:17:19 06/27/02 (5)

Time Limits - djk 02:18:47 06/28/02 (0)

Is there a way to print these images? - TimG 08:53:20 06/27/02 (3)

AlternaTiff... - darkmoebius 19:58:32 07/7/02 (0)

Re: Is there a way to print these images? - Tim Moorman 13:56:47 06/27/02 (0)

Re: Is there a way to print these images? - str8aro 09:01:51 06/27/02 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 06/29/0211:46:54 06/29/02 (77)

From Tom Danley - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 10:17:35 07/2/02 (76)

Re: From Tom Danley - Re: Patentable claim - Tom Dawson 09:57:22 07/3/02 (0)

From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:41:48 07/2/02 (74)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:29:29 07/3/02 (56)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:40:11 07/3/02 (52)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 11:50:41 07/4/02 (47)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:23:45 07/4/02 (46)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 16:48:59 07/4/02 (45)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:49:49 07/4/02 (44)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 10:45:57 07/5/02 (14)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:10:52 07/5/02 (13)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 14:49:43 07/5/02 (12)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - str8aro 19:49:25 07/5/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 00:01:03 07/6/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:28:43 07/5/02 (9)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 16:21:49 07/6/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:08:32 07/7/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 09:00:14 07/6/02 (6)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:23:07 07/6/02 (4)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 18:26:34 07/6/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 01:39:22 07/7/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 16:55:53 07/6/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:46:26 07/7/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 03:20:37 07/5/02 (29)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:38:48 07/5/02 (28)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 13:39:56 07/5/02 (5)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 14:07:08 07/5/02 (4)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 14:19:15 07/5/02 (3)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:47:03 07/5/02 (2)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 13:28:59 07/6/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:09:45 07/6/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:35:47 07/5/02 (21)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:49:15 07/5/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 14:14:09 07/5/02 (19)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:55:31 07/5/02 (18)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 09:18:20 07/6/02 (8)

Change your mind again? - Wayne Parham 23:10:09 07/14/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:05:37 07/6/02 (6)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 08:42:59 07/7/02 (5)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:01:00 07/8/02 (4)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 04:28:53 07/8/02 (3)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 12:45:35 07/8/02 (2)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 14:28:22 07/8/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:37:21 07/8/02 (0)

hard not to remember "the king of comb filtering"(nt) - Sam P. 07:10:54 07/6/02 (8)

Re: LOL - Magnetar 09:21:07 07/6/02 (7)

Re: LOL - Wayne Parham 14:04:14 07/6/02 (6)

Re: LOL - hancock 08:19:12 07/7/02 (5)

Re: LOL - Wayne Parham 12:47:15 07/7/02 (4)

Re: LOL - hancock 14:28:01 07/7/02 (3)

Re: LOL - Wayne Parham 14:54:45 07/7/02 (2)

Re: LOL - hancock 15:01:17 07/7/02 (1)

Re: LOL - Wayne Parham 15:29:09 07/7/02 (0)

Misconceptions - Mark Seaton 10:34:57 07/4/02 (1)

Re: Misconceptions Department of redundancy Department - tomservo 12:01:42 07/4/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 09:58:37 07/4/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:41:04 07/4/02 (0)

LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - Sam P. 15:10:57 07/3/02 (2)

Re: LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - hancock 08:39:22 07/4/02 (1)

Re: LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - Wayne Parham 14:39:54 07/4/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 08:24:59 07/3/02 (16)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:41:39 07/3/02 (15)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 17:39:04 07/3/02 (14)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 22:24:00 07/3/02 (13)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - DanWiggins 08:09:31 07/4/02 (12)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 09:57:06 07/4/02 (11)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 13:03:15 07/4/02 (10)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 22:53:34 07/4/02 (7)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 01:34:40 07/5/02 (6)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 12:08:51 07/5/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:59:24 07/5/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 08:54:53 07/5/02 (3)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:23:20 07/5/02 (2)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:47:11 07/5/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:09:41 07/5/02 (0)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Andre Jute 13:59:04 07/4/02 (1)

Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:41:47 07/4/02 (0)