In Reply to: Re: Unity Patent posted by str8aro on June 27, 2002 at 06:14:18:
Thanks for posting this John. I know Tom is happy all the paperwork finaly went through.For those reading, John is probably one of maybe 3 people outside of Sound Physics Labs I know of who has constructed and understand what is going on with the concept behind the Unity horn. As you mention, getting the time & phase correct is a bit trickier than is the amplitude. I know Tom has learned a lot about the process of making everything "jive" since the first VFL. The current C^3(Cinema Cube for my installers, and Contractor's Cube for the commercial market) speaker using the 17", 60x60 horn has come a long way in refinement from early stages. Tom is going through the TD-1 again applying what was found with the 17" version. The TD-1 with a more proper crossover may have performance to even be useable as hi-fi. I do know that with the current playing around Tom has been doing, he really has an itch to finally build a lens with a 32-36" mouth dimension in a 3 way configuration. While not likely to be complete, we may bring some sort of monster to the Summer Horn Bash. I'm working on bringing a pair of the C^3's and some Contras, where these would be bonus.
I do know Tom would be interested to see what you(John) have done with your horn, maybe this will offer an opportunity for it.
Regards,
Mark Seaton
Sound Physics Labs / ServoDrive
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Unity Patent - Mark Seaton 06/27/0210:20:57 06/27/02 (115)
- Re: Unity Patent - hancock 13:47:24 06/28/02 (0)
- Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:56:49 06/27/02 (96)
- Re: Patentable claim - larry moore 08:26:07 07/1/02 (1)
- Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:08:29 07/1/02 (0)
- Re: Patentable claim - hancock 23:34:36 06/28/02 (0)
- Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 10:39:50 06/28/02 (92)
- Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:47:47 06/28/02 (91)
- Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 14:03:23 06/28/02 (90)
- quarter wave resonance? - Tom Dawson 11:47:26 07/1/02 (4)
- Re: quarter wave resonance? - hancock 11:47:42 07/4/02 (3)
- Re: quarter wave resonance? - Wayne Parham 15:03:07 07/4/02 (2)
- Re: quarter wave resonance? - Mark Seaton 12:47:29 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: quarter wave resonance? - Wayne Parham 16:16:14 07/5/02 (0)
- Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:13:51 06/28/02 (82)
- Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 09:10:20 06/29/02 (81)
- flawwed logic - Sam P. 17:50:08 06/29/02 (2)
- Re: flawwed logic - hancock 01:27:18 06/30/02 (0)
- Re: flawed examination - Mark Seaton 19:58:22 06/29/02 (0)
- Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:46:54 06/29/02 (77)
- From Tom Danley - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 10:17:35 07/2/02 (76)
- Re: From Tom Danley - Re: Patentable claim - Tom Dawson 09:57:22 07/3/02 (0)
- From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:41:48 07/2/02 (74)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:29:29 07/3/02 (56)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:40:11 07/3/02 (52)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 11:50:41 07/4/02 (47)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:23:45 07/4/02 (46)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 16:48:59 07/4/02 (45)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:49:49 07/4/02 (44)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 10:45:57 07/5/02 (14)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:10:52 07/5/02 (13)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 14:49:43 07/5/02 (12)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - str8aro 19:49:25 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 00:01:03 07/6/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:28:43 07/5/02 (9)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 16:21:49 07/6/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:08:32 07/7/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 09:00:14 07/6/02 (6)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:23:07 07/6/02 (4)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 18:26:34 07/6/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 01:39:22 07/7/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 16:55:53 07/6/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:46:26 07/7/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 03:20:37 07/5/02 (29)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:38:48 07/5/02 (28)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 13:39:56 07/5/02 (5)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 14:07:08 07/5/02 (4)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 14:19:15 07/5/02 (3)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:47:03 07/5/02 (2)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 13:28:59 07/6/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:09:45 07/6/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:35:47 07/5/02 (21)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:49:15 07/5/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 14:14:09 07/5/02 (19)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:55:31 07/5/02 (18)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 09:18:20 07/6/02 (8)
- Change your mind again? - Wayne Parham 23:10:09 07/14/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:05:37 07/6/02 (6)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 08:42:59 07/7/02 (5)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:01:00 07/8/02 (4)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 04:28:53 07/8/02 (3)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 12:45:35 07/8/02 (2)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 14:28:22 07/8/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:37:21 07/8/02 (0)
- hard not to remember "the king of comb filtering"(nt) - Sam P. 07:10:54 07/6/02 (8)
- Re: LOL - Magnetar 09:21:07 07/6/02 (7)
- Misconceptions - Mark Seaton 10:34:57 07/4/02 (1)
- Re: Misconceptions Department of redundancy Department - tomservo 12:01:42 07/4/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 09:58:37 07/4/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:41:04 07/4/02 (0)
- LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - Sam P. 15:10:57 07/3/02 (2)
- Re: LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - hancock 08:39:22 07/4/02 (1)
- Re: LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - Wayne Parham 14:39:54 07/4/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 08:24:59 07/3/02 (16)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:41:39 07/3/02 (15)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 17:39:04 07/3/02 (14)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 22:24:00 07/3/02 (13)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - DanWiggins 08:09:31 07/4/02 (12)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 09:57:06 07/4/02 (11)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 13:03:15 07/4/02 (10)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 22:53:34 07/4/02 (7)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 01:34:40 07/5/02 (6)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 12:08:51 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:59:24 07/5/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 08:54:53 07/5/02 (3)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:23:20 07/5/02 (2)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:47:11 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:09:41 07/5/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Andre Jute 13:59:04 07/4/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:41:47 07/4/02 (0)
- How do I model 4 midrange drivers as 1 at the point where they enter the horn? - TimgG 14:30:55 06/28/02 (1)
- Re: How do I model 4 midrange drivers as 1 at the point where they enter the horn? - str8aro 17:42:35 06/28/02 (0)
- Bring em - Kevin P 11:55:55 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 10:34:25 06/27/02 (15)
- Re: Unity Patent - Kevin P 11:52:40 06/27/02 (5)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 12:31:01 06/27/02 (4)
- Re: Transport - Tim Moorman 15:03:34 06/27/02 (3)
- Re: Transport - str8aro 19:20:10 06/27/02 (2)
- Re: Transport--As in F250 Ford Pick em Up and/or... - Tim Moorman 14:13:23 06/29/02 (1)
- Re: Transport--As in F250 Ford Pick em Up and/or... - str8aro 16:35:16 06/29/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 11:40:31 06/27/02 (8)
- Re: Unity Patent - Bill Wassilak 12:45:34 06/27/02 (7)
- Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 13:01:50 06/27/02 (1)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 13:28:35 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 12:52:49 06/27/02 (4)
- Re: Unity Patent - Magnetar 05:53:12 06/28/02 (1)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 21:36:29 06/28/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - Paul Butterfield 15:09:37 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 13:03:52 06/27/02 (0)