In Reply to: Re: Unity Patent posted by mikebake on June 27, 2002 at 05:37:22:
Hi Mike,
As I see it, a unity style horn has all the strengths of a 'standard' multi-way horn system (like Edgar's Titan) but improves on such systems by being coaxial (without significant interference between frequency ranges, unlike a typical coax speaker), having lower throat distortion, and having a more uniform dispersion pattern. I think the coaxiality is a big one; mine is not time-aligned at the moment, but it still sounds better to me than my old 4-way horn system. I suppose some people might not like the unity's sound as it doesn't interact with the room nearly as much as typical speakers do. For the same reason, the room has less influence on the sound you hear which to me is a good thing.A weakness is that it's more complicated to design - you have standard horn design issues along with trying to get all the frequency sections time-aligned.
I imagine Mark Seaton will jump in here eventually and tell you about what Sound Physics Labs is using them for and where they're going with them.
John
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 06/27/0206:14:18 06/27/02 (117)
- Re: Unity Patent - Wayne Parham 19:47:15 07/14/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - Mark Seaton 10:20:57 06/27/02 (115)
- Re: Unity Patent - hancock 13:47:24 06/28/02 (0)
- Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:56:49 06/27/02 (96)
- Re: Patentable claim - larry moore 08:26:07 07/1/02 (1)
- Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:08:29 07/1/02 (0)
- Re: Patentable claim - hancock 23:34:36 06/28/02 (0)
- Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 10:39:50 06/28/02 (92)
- Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:47:47 06/28/02 (91)
- Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 14:03:23 06/28/02 (90)
- quarter wave resonance? - Tom Dawson 11:47:26 07/1/02 (4)
- Re: quarter wave resonance? - hancock 11:47:42 07/4/02 (3)
- Re: quarter wave resonance? - Wayne Parham 15:03:07 07/4/02 (2)
- Re: quarter wave resonance? - Mark Seaton 12:47:29 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: quarter wave resonance? - Wayne Parham 16:16:14 07/5/02 (0)
- Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:13:51 06/28/02 (82)
- Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 09:10:20 06/29/02 (81)
- flawwed logic - Sam P. 17:50:08 06/29/02 (2)
- Re: flawwed logic - hancock 01:27:18 06/30/02 (0)
- Re: flawed examination - Mark Seaton 19:58:22 06/29/02 (0)
- Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:46:54 06/29/02 (77)
- From Tom Danley - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 10:17:35 07/2/02 (76)
- Re: From Tom Danley - Re: Patentable claim - Tom Dawson 09:57:22 07/3/02 (0)
- From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:41:48 07/2/02 (74)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:29:29 07/3/02 (56)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:40:11 07/3/02 (52)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 11:50:41 07/4/02 (47)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:23:45 07/4/02 (46)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 16:48:59 07/4/02 (45)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:49:49 07/4/02 (44)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 10:45:57 07/5/02 (14)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:10:52 07/5/02 (13)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 14:49:43 07/5/02 (12)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - str8aro 19:49:25 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 00:01:03 07/6/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:28:43 07/5/02 (9)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 16:21:49 07/6/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:08:32 07/7/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 09:00:14 07/6/02 (6)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:23:07 07/6/02 (4)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 18:26:34 07/6/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 01:39:22 07/7/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - tomservo 16:55:53 07/6/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:46:26 07/7/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 03:20:37 07/5/02 (29)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:38:48 07/5/02 (28)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 13:39:56 07/5/02 (5)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 14:07:08 07/5/02 (4)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 14:19:15 07/5/02 (3)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:47:03 07/5/02 (2)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 13:28:59 07/6/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:09:45 07/6/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:35:47 07/5/02 (21)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:49:15 07/5/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 14:14:09 07/5/02 (19)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:55:31 07/5/02 (18)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 09:18:20 07/6/02 (8)
- Change your mind again? - Wayne Parham 23:10:09 07/14/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:05:37 07/6/02 (6)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Magnetar 08:42:59 07/7/02 (5)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 02:01:00 07/8/02 (4)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 04:28:53 07/8/02 (3)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 12:45:35 07/8/02 (2)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 14:28:22 07/8/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:37:21 07/8/02 (0)
- hard not to remember "the king of comb filtering"(nt) - Sam P. 07:10:54 07/6/02 (8)
- Re: LOL - Magnetar 09:21:07 07/6/02 (7)
- Misconceptions - Mark Seaton 10:34:57 07/4/02 (1)
- Re: Misconceptions Department of redundancy Department - tomservo 12:01:42 07/4/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 09:58:37 07/4/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 15:41:04 07/4/02 (0)
- LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - Sam P. 15:10:57 07/3/02 (2)
- Re: LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - hancock 08:39:22 07/4/02 (1)
- Re: LOL, using the phrase "linear phase response" - Wayne Parham 14:39:54 07/4/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 08:24:59 07/3/02 (16)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:41:39 07/3/02 (15)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 17:39:04 07/3/02 (14)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 22:24:00 07/3/02 (13)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - DanWiggins 08:09:31 07/4/02 (12)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 09:57:06 07/4/02 (11)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 13:03:15 07/4/02 (10)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 22:53:34 07/4/02 (7)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 01:34:40 07/5/02 (6)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Mark Seaton 12:08:51 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 16:59:24 07/5/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - dwiggins@adireaudio.com 08:54:53 07/5/02 (3)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 11:23:20 07/5/02 (2)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - hancock 13:47:11 07/5/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 17:09:41 07/5/02 (0)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Andre Jute 13:59:04 07/4/02 (1)
- Re: From Wayne Parham - Re: Patentable claim - Wayne Parham 14:41:47 07/4/02 (0)
- How do I model 4 midrange drivers as 1 at the point where they enter the horn? - TimgG 14:30:55 06/28/02 (1)
- Re: How do I model 4 midrange drivers as 1 at the point where they enter the horn? - str8aro 17:42:35 06/28/02 (0)
- Bring em - Kevin P 11:55:55 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 10:34:25 06/27/02 (15)
- Re: Unity Patent - Kevin P 11:52:40 06/27/02 (5)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 12:31:01 06/27/02 (4)
- Re: Transport - Tim Moorman 15:03:34 06/27/02 (3)
- Re: Transport - str8aro 19:20:10 06/27/02 (2)
- Re: Transport--As in F250 Ford Pick em Up and/or... - Tim Moorman 14:13:23 06/29/02 (1)
- Re: Transport--As in F250 Ford Pick em Up and/or... - str8aro 16:35:16 06/29/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 11:40:31 06/27/02 (8)
- Re: Unity Patent - Bill Wassilak 12:45:34 06/27/02 (7)
- Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 13:01:50 06/27/02 (1)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 13:28:35 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 12:52:49 06/27/02 (4)
- Re: Unity Patent - Magnetar 05:53:12 06/28/02 (1)
- Re: Unity Patent - str8aro 21:36:29 06/28/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - Paul Butterfield 15:09:37 06/27/02 (0)
- Re: Unity Patent - mikebake 13:03:52 06/27/02 (0)