Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
In Reply to: Because this is the Hi-Rez highway 2 channel SACD should NOT be attacked by comparison to CD. posted by Teresa on January 19, 2009 at 15:01:28:
..'i am DON'T like 2 channel sacd being dragged through the mud by statements like.......'...who proof-reads your positive feedback articles..?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - Teresa 04:45:49 01/19/09 (314)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - ramsac 11:19:41 01/30/09 (0)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - 5Minutes 01:35:52 01/30/09 (0)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - ramsac 09:49:37 01/26/09 (0)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - dcstep@swbell.net 15:20:26 01/24/09 (17)
- The Xindak SCD-2 retailed for $1,699, it is true I only paid $975 for it but for most that is a lot of money! - Teresa 15:54:14 01/24/09 (16)
- RE: The Xindak SCD-2 retailed for $1,699, it is true I only paid $975 for it but for most that is a lot of money! - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 16:11:17 01/24/09 (6)
- RE: The Xindak SCD-2 retailed for $1,699, it is true I only paid $975 for it but for most that is a lot of money! - Tony Lauck 17:06:37 01/24/09 (5)
- RE: The Xindak SCD-2 retailed for $1,699, it is true I only paid $975 for it but for most that is a lot of money! - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 03:31:07 01/25/09 (2)
- It wasn't my intention to single anyone out for a misdeed - Tony Lauck 08:18:45 01/25/09 (1)
- RE: It wasn't my intention to single anyone out for a misdeed - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:40:30 01/25/09 (0)
- At least you know I haven't been corrupted yet as I honestly print what I hear and see, - Teresa 18:26:08 01/24/09 (1)
- RE: At least you know I haven't been corrupted yet as I honestly print what I hear and see, - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 03:22:46 01/25/09 (0)
- SACD is for poor folks?? - dcstep@swbell.net 16:01:10 01/24/09 (8)
- "Unfortunately, 90% of the music produced today is NOT available on SACD" - rich121 02:58:18 01/25/09 (0)
- Well check out my new blog, I have listed all of my Classical works on hi-rez Digital by composer. - Teresa 18:37:39 01/24/09 (5)
- Teresa's out of her mind... - dcstep@swbell.net 19:59:00 01/24/09 (4)
- Well, you make it sound like CD is where 90% of the recorded music is. - Teresa 20:28:02 01/24/09 (3)
- RE: Well, you make it sound like CD is where 90% of the recorded music is. - dcstep@swbell.net 20:43:59 01/24/09 (2)
- Considering all the SACDs on my want list, I wouldn't have any money left over for CDs even if I liked them. - Teresa 21:12:47 01/24/09 (1)
- Give me high resolution or remain silent, so says - dcstep@swbell.net 07:01:44 01/25/09 (0)
- RE: SACD = Joe the plumber of music? - navman 18:01:48 01/24/09 (0)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - ramsac 09:45:10 01/24/09 (2)
- RE: Can't agree with you more............ - navman 10:27:51 01/24/09 (0)
- Mario, that's a totally reasonable and reasoned response. - Wendell Narrod 09:56:59 01/24/09 (0)
- Interesting questions. - Hiro 09:06:56 01/23/09 (21)
- Thanks Hiro I'm looking forward to reading it. Your blog is looking really sharp - Teresa 23:40:29 01/23/09 (16)
- RE: Thanks Hiro I'm looking forward to reading it. Your blog is looking really sharp - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:13:29 01/26/09 (0)
- RE: Thanks Hiro I'm looking forward to reading it. Your blog is looking really sharp - Hiro 14:26:04 01/25/09 (13)
- Hiro I did it, I moved my blog over to google and canceled My Space. - Teresa 04:25:00 01/26/09 (11)
- Thanks for the new link - I've just added it to my blog - Hiro 10:54:02 01/30/09 (0)
- Wow, Teresa officially confirms the limits of her musical tastes... - dcstep@swbell.net 07:30:04 01/26/09 (9)
- It's in poor taste to criticize others' musical tastes. (nt) - Tony Lauck 09:17:20 01/26/09 (0)
- Nearly half of the composers I have on high resolution are by modern 20th and 21st century composers - Teresa 08:59:26 01/26/09 (7)
- Teresa says, "Give me high resolution or remain silent," - dcstep@swbell.net 09:11:37 01/26/09 (6)
- Not a demand by a request and my listening preference. - Teresa 15:02:43 01/26/09 (5)
- RE: Not a demand by a request and my listening preference. - fas948 03:01:17 01/27/09 (4)
- I agree and if you read the posts above this one you would see that is exactly what Dave is saying - Teresa 04:18:10 01/27/09 (3)
- RE: I agree and if you read the posts above this one you would see that is exactly what Dave is saying - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 11:08:03 01/27/09 (2)
- That would be the same Yamaha and did you notice I said better CDs? Even those turned out to not good enough - Teresa 19:28:51 01/27/09 (1)
- About as convincing as Ron Hubbard, but he has his believers. :0) [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:01:49 01/28/09 (0)
- Thanks I'll check into it, your blog looks so much better than mine (;-) - Teresa 17:07:31 01/25/09 (0)
- Not at all - Metralla 07:26:32 01/24/09 (0)
- #cough#puppet#cough#cough# - navman 10:49:56 01/23/09 (3)
- he is obviously not a "sock puppet for two reasons - tunenut 13:28:13 01/24/09 (0)
- LOL!! Yes, Teresa forgot to have him 'materialise' until now. :0) [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 12:52:03 01/23/09 (1)
- Go away SACD bashing troll (nt) - Teresa 17:41:51 01/23/09 (0)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - jbufka2 19:21:59 01/21/09 (6)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:44:12 01/22/09 (0)
- Thank you! I will refer to 16 bit 44.1 kHz and RBCD as 'normal resolution' - Teresa 19:53:46 01/21/09 (4)
- I've changed my mind as there is no way I can consider 44.1kHz PCM as 'normal resolution' - Teresa 02:41:42 01/24/09 (2)
- RE: I've changed my mind as there is no way I can consider 44.1kHz PCM as 'normal resolution' - jbufka2 06:23:31 01/24/09 (1)
- I am sorry I didn't go into more detail but it was late at night and I was feeling guilty about agreeing - Teresa 15:20:28 01/24/09 (0)
- RE: "Intermediate" might even sound more accurate. - navman 13:21:02 01/22/09 (0)
- It's all about getting attention - flyingdutchman 06:52:54 01/21/09 (40)
- Teresa - flyingdutchman 21:12:30 01/27/09 (0)
- No it's about Wendell Narrod, Navman, jazz1, Chris Redmond and flyingdutchman getting attention by attacking - Teresa 18:10:24 01/21/09 (12)
- It's like being on Nixon's 'enemies' list. - powermatic 18:56:56 01/22/09 (1)
- RE: It's like being on Nixon's 'enemies' list. - Quadzilla 05:20:20 01/23/09 (0)
- the issues in your original post are nonsense - tunenut 18:47:46 01/21/09 (1)
- I don't have to pretend all CDs are unlistenable, they are to me! - Teresa 18:21:35 01/23/09 (0)
- Questions should not contain conclusions. - Wendell Narrod 18:47:44 01/21/09 (2)
- Exactly - the questions were basically "How can you possibly disagree with ME!" [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:47:13 01/22/09 (1)
- RE: Exactly - the questions were basically "How can you possibly disagree with ME!" [nt] - Tony Lauck 17:57:06 01/22/09 (0)
- RE: No it's about you getting attention - navman 18:21:13 01/21/09 (4)
- It not new you have attacked me before, you love and live to attack me. DO NOT EVER DO IT AGAIN!!!!!! - Teresa 18:24:26 01/21/09 (3)
- RE: For crying out loud - navman 18:28:53 01/21/09 (2)
- Well then quit trying and quit arguing, better yet stay out of my threads completely! (nt) - Teresa 18:33:53 01/21/09 (1)
- RE: Grow up - navman 18:40:12 01/21/09 (0)
- what else would we be doing? - tunenut 11:25:17 01/21/09 (17)
- You guys take this way too seriously - Pacman 14:50:54 01/23/09 (14)
- I agree she has been a valuable resource. - navman 10:05:16 01/24/09 (4)
- Ah c'mon Navman - Pacman 14:31:14 01/24/09 (3)
- That I was...... and was banned for it too - navman 17:42:41 01/24/09 (2)
- We will agree to disagree - Pacman 11:05:22 01/25/09 (1)
- LOL - navman 11:12:25 01/25/09 (0)
- RE: You guys take this way too seriously - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:00:32 01/24/09 (3)
- I am 100% serious!!! And this forum should be handled just like the Cable Asylum. - Teresa 02:14:48 01/24/09 (2)
- it is time for you to start you own forum on the web... - tunenut 07:55:42 01/24/09 (1)
- RE: Excellent idea! - navman 09:51:40 01/24/09 (0)
- you do not take this seriously enough - tunenut 23:24:07 01/23/09 (3)
- LOL - Pacman 08:10:38 01/24/09 (2)
- Thanks Pacman (;-) - Teresa 14:38:50 01/24/09 (0)
- thanks and same to you - tunenut 13:26:34 01/24/09 (0)
- Actually I don't think my views are extreme, there are many people who do not like any digital even SACD! - Teresa 18:32:22 01/23/09 (0)
- To borrow from a cliche ... - Quadzilla 11:41:36 01/21/09 (1)
- Your post pretty much sizes Teresa up perfectly (nt). - rich121 22:39:24 01/21/09 (0)
- Let me lead the way............ - Chuck Y 09:01:49 01/21/09 (2)
- If you read the original post it is not about me! The ONLY thing I have done is defend myself against attack, - Teresa 18:00:08 01/21/09 (1)
- RE: Don't be ashamed of them - navman 18:07:53 01/21/09 (0)
- I agree - navman 07:26:23 01/21/09 (4)
- No one debated, No one even answered a single question in my post. You were one of the first to attack - Teresa 18:05:54 01/21/09 (3)
- RE: I have tried to reason with you - navman 18:12:18 01/21/09 (2)
- I have never hassled anyone, perhaps you can teach me how as you are very good at it. - Teresa 18:19:20 01/21/09 (1)
- RE: Peopel have discussed your equipment....wasnt me. - navman 18:28:05 01/21/09 (0)
- Reread this post, all I wanted was opinions on why some could not here differences - Teresa 04:39:48 01/21/09 (2)
- Read this answer twice, then do not respond. - madisonears 16:50:49 01/21/09 (0)
- Just accept they do and stop losing sleep over it. Give peace a chance.... [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 06:40:15 01/21/09 (0)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:35:44 01/20/09 (44)
- My Yamaha has a retail of $450. I have owned SACD players with retail of up to $1,800, and - Teresa 14:57:14 01/20/09 (43)
- RE: You have provided a good example - navman 15:25:20 01/20/09 (42)
- I have never told anyone to hate CDs, I don't even mind people listening to ultra-low resolution MP3s - Teresa 15:34:31 01/20/09 (41)
- RE: You know I hate SACDs - navman 16:18:43 01/20/09 (17)
- Dude I have no problem with ANYONE hating SACDs and HATING high resolution. - Teresa 19:07:55 01/20/09 (14)
- "When single-layer CDs are in the dustbin of history, and all CDs are hybrid" , what favor is the Kool-Aid? - TommyTunes 06:18:25 01/21/09 (0)
- RE: Dude I have no problem with ANYONE hating SACDs and HATING high resolution. - Ric Schultz 22:52:09 01/20/09 (11)
- Ric I have listened to other systems, many very expensive - Teresa 23:24:10 01/20/09 (10)
- RE: Ric I have listened to other systems, many very expensive - CSF 01:38:34 01/21/09 (9)
- Easy I don't care if people listen to CDs, just don't attempt to tear SACD down. - Teresa 02:19:22 01/21/09 (8)
- RE: Easy I don't care if people listen to CDs, just don't attempt to tear SACD down. - CSF 11:26:39 01/21/09 (0)
- "4 or 5 childish posters baiting me in this thread" - rich121 02:41:52 01/21/09 (6)
- Rick have you read this whole thread and the questions asked by me in the original posts? - Teresa 03:24:53 01/21/09 (5)
- "None and I repeat NONE of my posts have ever been less than childish." I agree! [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 03:48:47 01/21/09 (4)
- I fixed the typo I was orignally going to say "less than intelligent" but expanded and forgot to drop 2 words. - Teresa 04:09:10 01/21/09 (3)
- I'd say it was a Freudian slip - not a typo. :0) [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 07:24:52 01/21/09 (2)
- Chris you are feel to visit my home, you will not see a single CD anywhere! (nt) - Teresa 18:21:26 01/21/09 (1)
- Feel? Another Freudian slip? :0) [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:51:16 01/22/09 (0)
- RE: Well - navman 19:52:23 01/20/09 (0)
- RE: You know I hate SACDs - coolhand 17:29:13 01/20/09 (1)
- Thanks for the reality check - navman 19:02:23 01/20/09 (0)
- RE: I have never told anyone to hate CDs, I don't even mind people listening to ultra-low resolution MP3s - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 16:11:55 01/20/09 (21)
- SACD is more resolving than CD by a wide margin & the Yamaha is a giant killer at it's regular price of $450 - Teresa 19:23:31 01/20/09 (0)
- RE: Good post - navman 16:19:32 01/20/09 (19)
- RE: Good post - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 16:34:18 01/20/09 (18)
- Chris I only have a problem enjoying one single format "CD", every other format I enjoy quite a bit. - Teresa 19:57:42 01/20/09 (0)
- RE: Good post - Tony Lauck 17:32:57 01/20/09 (5)
- RE: Good post - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 03:23:14 01/21/09 (4)
- RE: Good post - Tony Lauck 07:59:36 01/21/09 (3)
- RE: Good post - navman 09:25:14 01/21/09 (0)
- RE: Good post - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:04:37 01/21/09 (1)
- RE: Good post - Tony Lauck 10:36:43 01/21/09 (0)
- And that is the problem.......... - navman 16:44:59 01/20/09 (10)
- I am very sick of your attitude and lying about me Navman this has to end now! - Teresa 19:35:25 01/20/09 (9)
- I really am tired of this - navman 21:50:19 01/20/09 (8)
- Bald face lies and purposeful misinterpretations! Here is the original post of mine: - Teresa 23:06:50 01/20/09 (7)
- RE: All I say is - navman 07:20:23 01/21/09 (6)
- I post on the Vinyl Asylum daily. There is NO problem until someone starts promoting CD on the Vinyl Asylum. - Teresa 18:37:22 01/21/09 (5)
- If someone is asking if the vinyl or sacd/cd release - Wendell Narrod 12:23:50 01/24/09 (4)
- Maybe, maybe not and here are my thoughts: - Teresa 16:00:31 01/24/09 (3)
- With new music there is, usually, only one release on vinyl. - Wendell Narrod 16:14:25 01/24/09 (2)
- Hadn't thought about new music, that's a whole different perspective. - Teresa 16:39:38 01/24/09 (1)
- It's easy. If you've heard both you can offer an opinion - Wendell Narrod 16:42:01 01/24/09 (0)
- "And if I get my way" - Wendell Narrod 16:08:15 01/20/09 (0)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - Know_Talent 12:54:16 01/20/09 (0)
- Teresa, I tried your new Yamaha SACD/DVD, and... - Jim Stoneburner 20:19:53 01/19/09 (4)
- Thanks Jim, it gets even better with time, at the six month point it really starts sounding sweet. - Teresa 20:42:52 01/19/09 (3)
- I got the DVD-S1800, needing both a decent DVD player (not ready for blu-ray) and SACD backup... - Jim Stoneburner 21:26:00 01/19/09 (2)
- I use the XLO/Reference Recordings System Burn-In - Teresa 22:00:05 01/19/09 (1)
- I prefer music as break-in so as to not overstress analog circuits, esp. if run 24/7... - Jim Stoneburner 22:36:03 01/19/09 (0)
- I'll put CD on my rig against SACD on yours Teresa. nt - Ozzie 18:01:22 01/19/09 (19)
- RE: I'll put CD on my rig against SACD on yours Teresa. nt - finnman500@hotmail.com 12:25:07 01/23/09 (0)
- Your on, should be super easy as I have not heard CD anywhere that was acceptable to my ears. (nt) - Teresa 18:38:08 01/19/09 (17)
- Are you for real? - Quadzilla 09:37:52 01/20/09 (16)
- What is your problem? Just why do you think I abhor the CD format so much? - Teresa 14:26:26 01/20/09 (7)
- Added warmth, huh? - Ozzie 16:49:37 01/20/09 (4)
- My AMC tube preamp though my Adcom power amp sounds warm and beautiful with every format out there except one! - Teresa 19:45:43 01/20/09 (3)
- Why list system specs? - Ozzie 17:47:44 01/21/09 (1)
- In order to hear all the sonic benefits of SACD, one needs at reproduce the important ultrasonic frequencies - Teresa 18:10:12 01/23/09 (0)
- Door stops. nt - Quadzilla 08:11:47 01/21/09 (0)
- RE: What is your problem? Just why do you think I abhor the CD format so much? - CSF 15:06:18 01/20/09 (1)
- I have never had a problem with people who are about to listen to CDs - Teresa 15:17:02 01/20/09 (0)
- Teresa provides the comic relief for the group. - Wendell Narrod 09:50:18 01/20/09 (7)
- She put's the Asylum in Audio - TommyTunes 10:41:24 01/20/09 (6)
- ... or at least the OCD wing of the Asylum. nt - Quadzilla 12:34:34 01/20/09 (5)
- Attempted organized religous wing of the Asylum - navman 12:49:21 01/20/09 (4)
- We should have a lottery ... - Quadzilla 13:08:05 01/20/09 (3)
- RE: We should have a lottery ... - coolhand 17:38:11 01/20/09 (2)
- I have an excellent system, I spent decades putting it together. - Teresa 19:48:38 01/20/09 (1)
- Then if I were you I'd want my time back - TommyTunes 06:10:00 01/21/09 (0)
- Since you brought it up... - Coyodo 17:28:11 01/19/09 (8)
- disagree 100%, not even close even the best CDs sound digital, yet most SACDs sound more like analog! (nt) - Teresa 18:39:57 01/19/09 (7)
- OK, I respect your OPINION... - Coyodo 18:43:32 01/19/09 (6)
- It could well be..... - jazz1 00:11:23 01/20/09 (2)
- RE: It could well be..... - docmark 13:46:30 01/20/09 (1)
- I have a very wide frequency response system and large floor standing speakers. - Teresa 14:47:06 01/20/09 (0)
- It continues until everyone agrees with Teresa. - Wendell Narrod 19:05:00 01/19/09 (2)
- RE: It continues until everyone agrees with Teresa. - jazz1 09:30:33 01/20/09 (1)
- RE: LOL .... I wonder how he made it so far! nt - navman 09:53:17 01/20/09 (0)
- teresa talarc makes cds - Ben Van Dyk 17:19:35 01/19/09 (10)
- I bought many Telarc CDs, they still sound like CDs. If you want to hear what Telarc can do you need SACD! - Teresa 18:42:30 01/19/09 (9)
- RE: I bought many Telarc CDs, they still sound like CDs. If you want to hear what Telarc can do you need SACD! - throwback 09:07:20 01/20/09 (8)
- I love those as well, Telarc SACDs need to be played at realistic levels to flesh them out. - Teresa 15:00:49 01/20/09 (7)
- RE: I love those as well, Telarc SACDs need to be played at realistic levels to flesh them out. - throwback 16:04:40 01/20/09 (6)
- Oh well, not everyone likes Telarc. I do wish the RCA Living Stereo & Mercury Living Presence reissues resume - Teresa 16:17:05 01/20/09 (5)
- LOL - navman 17:03:11 01/20/09 (3)
- They don't have to replace the whole product just the disc. - Teresa 03:07:41 01/21/09 (2)
- RE: They don't have to replace the whole product just the disc. - Tony Lauck 15:38:10 01/21/09 (0)
- RE: Ask an economist if its a feasible modelespecially in the current economic climate. - navman 07:18:29 01/21/09 (0)
- Your plan of action. - Wendell Narrod 16:58:04 01/20/09 (0)
- If you think SACD.. - Bruce B 14:41:20 01/19/09 (1)
- SACD Multi-channel? (not HT?) - Robert C. Lang 15:14:33 01/19/09 (0)
- I think, the problem is.......... - Awe-d-o-file 14:13:18 01/19/09 (3)
- I also described the differences in downloads as it takes the physical disc out of the question. - Teresa 14:49:27 01/19/09 (2)
- RE: I also described the differences in downloads as it takes the physical disc out of the question. - Awe-d-o-file 15:03:47 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: As has been mentioned ad nauseum - navman 15:01:32 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - coolhand 13:55:30 01/19/09 (0)
- This is the SACD site - why do you keep talking about CD? - Metralla 13:11:04 01/19/09 (17)
- Because this is the Hi-Rez highway 2 channel SACD should NOT be attacked by comparison to CD. - Teresa 15:01:28 01/19/09 (13)
- RE: Because this is the Hi-Rez highway 2 channel SACD should NOT be attacked by comparison to CD. - docmark 18:08:55 01/20/09 (1)
- Still one has to follow ones heart if they are to remain true to themselves. I do intend SACD/CD hybrids to - Teresa 20:00:44 01/20/09 (0)
- RE: Because this is the Hi-Rez highway 2 channel SACD should NOT be attacked by comparison to CD. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:30:10 01/20/09 (0)
- RE: Because this is the Hi-Rez highway 2 channel SACD should NOT be attacked by comparison to CD. - Ben Van Dyk 17:30:02 01/19/09 (1)
- Because SACD is not a "glorified CD" as you say, but is totally different! SACD honors the music CD does not! - Teresa 18:47:15 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: Because this is the Hi-Rez highway 2 channel SACD should NOT be attacked by comparison to CD. - calloway 01/19/0915:23:30 01/19/09 (1)
- Thanks I took out the extra word. (nt) - Teresa 15:25:34 01/19/09 (0)
- So quit bringing it up. You are your own worst enemy - flyingdutchman 15:12:54 01/19/09 (4)
- You were not the one under attack for nearly a week defending 2 channel SACD - Teresa 15:23:41 01/19/09 (3)
- Yeah, and all I want is a date with Christie Brinkley - srl1 19:22:26 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: 2 more weeks for the same posts - Ben Van Dyk 17:55:21 01/19/09 (0)
- Simply shameful! It ranks right up there with world hunger, - Wendell Narrod 15:28:20 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: People have differeing opinions regarding the differences between CD and SACD - navman 15:05:37 01/19/09 (0)
- I'm surprised she even has the time to listen to her SACDs anyway - flyingdutchman 13:14:29 01/19/09 (2)
- Actually it's ZS-KEKL and he didn't like CDs either but for a different reason, no multichannel. - Teresa 03:44:11 01/21/09 (0)
- "She's the Zkekl of the Hi-Rez highway" Exactly!!!! (nt) - rich121 03:21:27 01/21/09 (0)
- Will someone please take that shovel off Teresa and get her out of that hole? [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 11:21:10 01/19/09 (15)
- RE: Will someone please take that shovel off Teresa and get her out of that hole? [nt] - flyingdutchman 11:56:06 01/19/09 (13)
- This is the Hi-Rez highway not Digital Drive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - Teresa 15:03:57 01/19/09 (1)
- RE: This is the Hi-Rez highway not Digital Drive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! - jazz1 22:22:42 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: Will someone please take that shovel off Teresa and get her out of that hole? [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:44:19 01/19/09 (10)
- No CDs would be a version of HELL for me, no way dude! (nt) - Teresa 15:06:15 01/19/09 (9)
- See Teresa, the truth finally comes out!!!! :^) (nt) - rich121 03:25:00 01/21/09 (1)
- Correct punctuation does make a difference in the meaning, I actually mean: No! CDs would be a version of hell - Teresa 03:32:51 01/21/09 (0)
- Typo: put an exclamation mark after No - navman 16:16:31 01/19/09 (1)
- Rats! I was waiting to see if she noticed. - Wendell Narrod 16:24:29 01/19/09 (0)
- This doesn't make sense, even for you, considering your fanaticism. - Wendell Narrod 15:39:27 01/19/09 (4)
- It mean I cannot tolerate the adverse sound qualities of CD and it would be my version of hell. - Teresa 15:45:13 01/19/09 (3)
- "It's not fanaticism but CD disgust!" - Wendell Narrod 15:54:21 01/19/09 (2)
- I am definitely prejudiced against 44.1kHz PCM, but I do tolerate a CD layer on my SACDs - Teresa 16:30:50 01/19/09 (1)
- I'm sure the manufacturers are relieved that you will tolerate - Wendell Narrod 16:38:23 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: Take away the shovel and I fear she will keep digging with her hands. - navman 11:26:47 01/19/09 (0)
- Why do you do this? - Quadzilla 11:11:29 01/19/09 (2)
- Because 2 channel SACD has been under attack the last few weeks but people wrongly claiming - Teresa 15:10:08 01/19/09 (1)
- The only person who is claiming SACD is being unfairly attacked is you - flyingdutchman 15:14:35 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - jazz1 10:56:22 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - CSF 10:53:13 01/19/09 (0)
- I listened to an SACD and a CD last night... - tunenut 10:16:17 01/19/09 (0)
- You continually embarass yourself. - Wendell Narrod 10:13:11 01/19/09 (5)
- I made a very logical post, indeed it may go in my next book. Why does logic bother you so? - Teresa 15:19:03 01/19/09 (4)
- Your original post is opinion, not logic - tunenut 20:01:31 01/19/09 (0)
- Teresa, Teresa, Teresa..... - Wendell Narrod 15:21:02 01/19/09 (2)
- Are you trying to be funny, because I'm not laughing. (nt) - Teresa 15:26:41 01/19/09 (1)
- Ah, but you should. All fanaticism needs to be ridiculed. - Wendell Narrod 15:33:55 01/19/09 (0)
- Question for the One who thinks there's no difference between a bad performance in good sound and... - jdaniel@jps.net 09:27:02 01/19/09 (1)
- I demand excellent performances of music I love in the best sound available. THIS IS NOT TOO MUCH TO ASK! - Teresa 15:31:25 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - calloway 09:03:44 01/19/09 (0)
- Here we go again!! - jazz1 06:29:00 01/19/09 (1)
- Those couple of days of silence - navman 07:29:37 01/19/09 (0)
- Keep beating that dead horse - TommyTunes 06:17:26 01/19/09 (62)
- Beating that dead horse - navman 15:14:03 01/20/09 (0)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse-Nonsense - fmak 06:33:35 01/19/09 (60)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse-Nonsense - TommyTunes 07:57:07 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - navman 07:28:39 01/19/09 (58)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - fmak 07:42:42 01/19/09 (57)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:59:18 01/19/09 (31)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - fmak 22:56:00 01/19/09 (30)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 07:36:44 01/20/09 (29)
- fmak just a warning Chris Redmond has baited us at least 10 years with these same questions. - Teresa 15:30:52 01/20/09 (22)
- RE:You get yourself into these flame wars and then find one person to scapegoat - navman 16:50:27 01/20/09 (11)
- BTW no one as answered any of the questions in that post yet, just attack - Teresa 20:13:39 01/20/09 (10)
- RE: BTW I tried to, the best I could - navman 08:26:04 01/21/09 (4)
- Navman I let your original post stand as is because it actually explains how you feel - Teresa 18:52:14 01/21/09 (3)
- RE: If you really look into most threads - navman 18:59:39 01/21/09 (2)
- I guess I need to apologize as it is the later more aggressive posts I remember. (nt) - Teresa 19:11:02 01/21/09 (1)
- RE: Accepted. - navman 19:12:25 01/21/09 (0)
- RE: BTW no one as answered any of the questions in that post yet, just attack - rich121 03:42:41 01/21/09 (4)
- I listened to everything they said, of course it had nothing to do with the original post - Teresa 04:05:58 01/21/09 (3)
- "I will never like CD even a little bit even from a $50,000 CD player." - Wendell Narrod 04:51:48 01/21/09 (2)
- Well then quit hammering me on it! And go back and read what this thread was supposed to be about. - Teresa 05:10:58 01/21/09 (1)
- No one cares what I think with the exception of me. - Wendell Narrod 05:14:27 01/21/09 (0)
- Who posted about CD in Hi-Rez Teresa? You're baiting - I'm just swallowing the hook! [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 16:19:19 01/20/09 (9)
- A few simple questions to the posters who claim to hear little or no difference between 2 channel SACD and CD. - Teresa 20:21:12 01/20/09 (8)
- RE: A few simple questions to the posters who claim to hear little or no difference between 2 channel SACD and CD. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 03:45:38 01/21/09 (7)
- No because they cannot disagree with logic when I laid it out so instead they attack, like you for instance. - Teresa 04:19:57 01/21/09 (6)
- "I got my answers, this thread called out the pro-CD trolls." - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 06:37:38 01/21/09 (1)
- RE: So the question/s were meant to be provocative. - navman 08:30:59 01/21/09 (0)
- It is difficult to have a dialogue with a fanatic. - Wendell Narrod 05:00:08 01/21/09 (3)
- Here is a few from the last week: - Teresa 05:57:18 01/21/09 (2)
- These are impressions of people - navman 07:25:18 01/21/09 (0)
- Those are opinions of what they hear. Not one says - Wendell Narrod 06:28:26 01/21/09 (0)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - fmak 08:26:45 01/20/09 (5)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:22:54 01/20/09 (4)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - fmak 10:32:29 01/20/09 (3)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:43:57 01/20/09 (2)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - fmak 23:14:13 01/20/09 (1)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 03:41:08 01/21/09 (0)
- "Who is telling anyone not to buy CDs?" - Wendell Narrod 09:42:26 01/19/09 (21)
- RE: "Who is telling anyone not to buy CDs?" - fmak 10:20:18 01/19/09 (1)
- You must have missed the thread. Many of us have - Wendell Narrod 10:21:35 01/19/09 (0)
- begs? - navman 09:53:32 01/19/09 (18)
- that's rather odd - Joe Murphy Jr 21:10:35 01/19/09 (17)
- Exactly - navman 07:19:42 01/20/09 (15)
- I will explain what Single-layer CDs are: - Teresa 15:43:16 01/20/09 (14)
- Simple concepts explained once again - navman 16:26:46 01/20/09 (13)
- Such a simpleton! Have you ever read on your SACDs "SACD/CD Hybrid"? - Teresa 20:34:23 01/20/09 (12)
- Shiny disks are dinosaurs - Tony Lauck 16:11:40 01/21/09 (2)
- RE: Shiny disks are dinosaurs - docmark 17:15:32 01/23/09 (1)
- RE: Shiny disks are dinosaurs - Tony Lauck 17:37:13 01/23/09 (0)
- Yes I have read "SACD/CD Hybrid" on my hybrid SACDs - navman 21:46:16 01/20/09 (8)
- I did not insult you but boomeranged your insult back to you. - Teresa 23:49:15 01/20/09 (7)
- RE: I did not insult you but boomeranged your insult back to you. - navman 07:51:31 01/21/09 (4)
- RE: I did not insult you but boomeranged your insult back to you. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:15:43 01/21/09 (3)
- Chris play nice, the other layer of a hybrid disc is an SACD not another CD. - Teresa 19:08:25 01/21/09 (1)
- Which is the point we're making! No dual layer CDs! - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:58:14 01/22/09 (0)
- RE: Had some single layered - navman 09:27:36 01/21/09 (0)
- RE: LOL - navman 07:22:16 01/21/09 (1)
- Millions!! - flyingdutchman 08:44:24 01/21/09 (0)
- Joe that's SACD/CD Hybrids (dual layer) no need for single-layer CDs anymore. - Teresa 22:03:54 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - navman 07:52:55 01/19/09 (2)
- RE: Keep beating that dead horse - TommyTunes 08:02:04 01/19/09 (1)
- I'll have to envy you there then! - navman 09:13:47 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: I think there is a difference between SACD and redbook - navman 05:50:23 01/19/09 (0)
- RE: Questions for the few that think there is not much difference 2 channel SACD and CD - fmak 05:09:41 01/19/09 (3)
- It's a straw man. I haven't seen anyone here argue there - Wendell Narrod 10:47:30 01/19/09 (2)
- RE: I agree. - navman 15:55:07 01/19/09 (0)
- No it's pretty straight forward high resolution SACD can sound very realistic and analog-like. - Teresa 15:42:13 01/19/09 (0)
Follow Ups
- RE: Because this is the Hi-Rez highway 2 channel SACD should NOT be attacked by comparison to CD. - calloway 01/19/0915:23:30 01/19/09 (1)
- Thanks I took out the extra word. (nt) - Teresa 15:25:34 01/19/09 (0)