In Reply to: Redbook could have done it complete justice. nt posted by Duilawyer on December 3, 2003 at 22:24:44:
SACD is all about me getting my own personal collection of master tape clones. To infer that just because a recording is old, or mono, or non-DSD master, or whatever that it is therefore not worthy.....well that just misses the point.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Redbook could have done it complete justice. NOT!!! - Norman Tracy 12/3/0322:43:51 12/3/03 (13)
- Redbook could have done it complete justice. - Duilawyer 08:00:55 12/4/03 (9)
- Yeah, maybe the XRCD2 or XRCD24 could be worthy, but then....... - Chris Garrett 18:24:41 12/4/03 (0)
- you know you can get this on redbook... - tunenut 10:54:48 12/4/03 (7)
- Easy. Since the difference is so small in $$$, I hedge my - Duilawyer 21:50:22 12/4/03 (3)
- fair enough (except the last line) - tunenut 09:21:46 12/5/03 (0)
- You need a new hobby... - rebop 07:49:24 12/5/03 (0)
- Re: Easy. Since the difference is so small in $$$, I hedge my - Ted Smith 00:26:03 12/5/03 (0)
- I suspect you are right. Duilawyer says one thing and does another - Norm 15:11:32 12/4/03 (2)
- Show us this inconsistency. We are dying to see it. nt - Duilawyer 21:52:03 12/4/03 (1)
- Since you ad nauseam insist that CDs are the equal of SACDs - Norm 06:03:39 12/5/03 (0)
- Cracks and pops and hiss - Bengt N 03:08:53 12/4/03 (2)
- With new 24 bit mastering, etc.? - Duilawyer 08:03:05 12/4/03 (1)
- wrong - rebop 08:59:40 12/4/03 (0)