In Reply to: Sarah Vaughan - 1954 mono recording on SACD non-hybrid posted by Metralla on December 3, 2003 at 21:22:53:
f
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Redbook could have done it complete justice. nt - Duilawyer 12/3/0322:24:44 12/3/03 (15)
- I'm not sure... - Willie The Squid 19:21:49 12/4/03 (0)
- Re: Redbook could have done it complete justice. NOT!!! - Norman Tracy 22:43:51 12/3/03 (13)
- Redbook could have done it complete justice. - Duilawyer 08:00:55 12/4/03 (9)
- Yeah, maybe the XRCD2 or XRCD24 could be worthy, but then....... - Chris Garrett 18:24:41 12/4/03 (0)
- you know you can get this on redbook... - tunenut 10:54:48 12/4/03 (7)
- Easy. Since the difference is so small in $$$, I hedge my - Duilawyer 21:50:22 12/4/03 (3)
- fair enough (except the last line) - tunenut 09:21:46 12/5/03 (0)
- You need a new hobby... - rebop 07:49:24 12/5/03 (0)
- Re: Easy. Since the difference is so small in $$$, I hedge my - Ted Smith 00:26:03 12/5/03 (0)
- I suspect you are right. Duilawyer says one thing and does another - Norm 15:11:32 12/4/03 (2)
- Show us this inconsistency. We are dying to see it. nt - Duilawyer 21:52:03 12/4/03 (1)
- Since you ad nauseam insist that CDs are the equal of SACDs - Norm 06:03:39 12/5/03 (0)
- Cracks and pops and hiss - Bengt N 03:08:53 12/4/03 (2)
- With new 24 bit mastering, etc.? - Duilawyer 08:03:05 12/4/03 (1)
- wrong - rebop 08:59:40 12/4/03 (0)