In Reply to: RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback posted by rich121 on June 23, 2009 at 09:55:35:
"You expect me to take what you say serious when you can't even reply without distorting what I said?"
It's sad, when they have to basically tell lies about what you say to make their point, they've lost the argument and their credibility.
No need to 'attack' them at all with your own posts as their own are all any reasonable person has to read to see what the facts are.
Juts remember you're not alone - it's a predictable pattern;
1. You don't agree SACD is vastly superior so to their minds you are saying CD is better.
2. You are bewildered and deny any such thing.
3. You are attacking them, are a pro-CD Troll and should not be on this forum.
Today is a gift - that's why it's called the Present.
Best Regards,
Chris Redmond.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 06/25/0917:47:32 06/25/09 (0)