![]() |
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
In Reply to: Oh NO! posted by navman on June 25, 2009 at 07:15:43:
?????
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - Pete Watt 11:35:59 06/22/09 (98)
- Thanks for your reponses. Two observations. - Pete Watt 09:22:10 06/26/09 (6)
- RE: Thanks for your reponses. Two observations. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:40:13 06/26/09 (5)
- Note to self. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 16:24:40 06/27/09 (4)
- yea, I was wondering about that. (nt) - Jack G 19:31:13 06/27/09 (3)
- Another two posts gone today - this thread is getting smaller as it gets older..... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:20:09 06/28/09 (2)
- That was a good film, eh? - Metralla 02:30:53 06/29/09 (1)
- Loved it. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 06:05:33 06/29/09 (0)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 15:29:24 06/25/09 (0)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - Charlez 23:48:34 06/24/09 (10)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - Tony Lauck 11:26:15 06/25/09 (9)
- Who cares... - rich121 23:02:57 06/25/09 (8)
- RE: Who cares... - Tony Lauck 07:43:58 06/26/09 (7)
- I think the main reason that RBCD has had an extended life - navman 08:58:23 06/26/09 (5)
- RE: I think the main reason that RBCD has had an extended life - Tony Lauck 12:12:22 06/26/09 (4)
- RE: I think the main reason that RBCD has had an extended life - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:26:59 06/26/09 (2)
- RE: I think the main reason that RBCD has had an extended life - Tony Lauck 14:11:35 06/26/09 (1)
- RE: I think the main reason that RBCD has had an extended life - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:24:39 06/26/09 (0)
- RE: Also one good sign imho - navman 12:53:28 06/26/09 (0)
- RE: Who cares... - fmak 08:27:42 06/26/09 (0)
- What a fun thread this is! - Jack G 13:27:23 06/24/09 (6)
- It would be a lot more fun if Teresa were here (nt)! - audiozorro 14:22:24 06/24/09 (5)
- Fear not. She's back! - Wendell Narrod 17:55:58 06/24/09 (3)
- Oh NO! - navman 07:15:43 06/25/09 (2)
- Gone again? - Wendell Narrod 06/25/0914:51:23 06/25/09 (1)
- Hopefully. nt - navman 14:58:46 06/25/09 (0)
- No Teresa needed, a couple other inmates also suffer Teresanervosa... (nt) - rich121 15:17:28 06/24/09 (0)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - Michael O 06:53:52 06/23/09 (0)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - Tony Lauck 17:38:26 06/22/09 (25)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - fmak 23:48:02 06/22/09 (24)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - Tony Lauck 05:57:30 06/23/09 (23)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - fmak 06:16:16 06/23/09 (22)
- Your post makes no sense.. (nt) - rich121 09:04:53 06/23/09 (21)
- Made perfect sense to me. - Tony Lauck 09:18:28 06/23/09 (20)
- RE: Made perfect sense to me. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:57:41 06/24/09 (4)
- RE: Made perfect sense to me. - Tony Lauck 07:50:24 06/24/09 (3)
- RE: Made perfect sense to me. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 10:05:09 06/24/09 (2)
- RE: Made perfect sense to me. - Hiro 10:47:51 06/25/09 (1)
- RE: Made perfect sense to me. - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:45:59 06/25/09 (0)
- RE: Made perfect sense to me. - CSF 02:52:23 06/24/09 (2)
- RE: Made perfect sense to me. - Tony Lauck 08:19:26 06/24/09 (1)
- RE: Made perfect sense to me. - fmak 09:01:15 06/24/09 (0)
- Tony - navman 13:45:04 06/23/09 (10)
- RE: Tony - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:49:23 06/24/09 (8)
- RE: Tony - Tony Lauck 17:59:18 06/24/09 (7)
- RE: Tony - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 23:42:42 06/24/09 (6)
- RE: Tony - Tony Lauck 07:54:17 06/26/09 (5)
- RE: Tony - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:24:12 06/26/09 (0)
- " I stand behind my posts. Do your own homework." - Wendell Narrod 08:01:50 06/26/09 (3)
- RE: " I stand behind my posts. Do your own homework." - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:43:05 06/26/09 (0)
- RE: " I stand behind my posts. Do your own homework." - Tony Lauck 08:14:29 06/26/09 (1)
- RE: " I stand behind my posts. Do your own homework." - fmak 23:07:33 06/27/09 (0)
- RE: Tony - Tony Lauck 09:35:28 06/24/09 (0)
- RE: Made perfect sense to me. - rich121 09:47:24 06/23/09 (0)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 12:33:02 06/22/09 (43)
- You are welcome to your opinion.... - Pacman 06:29:55 06/23/09 (10)
- RE: You are welcome to your opinion.... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:09:45 06/23/09 (8)
- cd better than sacd ... - smart845 10:16:20 06/24/09 (2)
- RE: cd better than sacd ... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:12:48 06/24/09 (0)
- RE: cd better than sacd ... - Tony Lauck 11:35:06 06/24/09 (0)
- forget the absolutes... - tunenut 13:26:16 06/23/09 (2)
- RE: forget the absolutes... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:45:57 06/24/09 (1)
- RE: forget the absolutes... - Tony Lauck 09:41:20 06/24/09 (0)
- You must really miss Teresa - Pacman 09:10:26 06/23/09 (1)
- RE: You must really miss Teresa - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:21:02 06/23/09 (0)
- Well said (nt) - racerguy 07:28:00 06/23/09 (0)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - fmak 23:45:52 06/22/09 (20)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - rich121 03:00:53 06/23/09 (19)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - fmak 06:21:26 06/23/09 (18)
- fmak... - Ozzie 10:17:40 06/23/09 (9)
- RE: fmak... - fmak 13:31:57 06/23/09 (8)
- RE: fmak... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 17:56:16 06/25/09 (7)
- RE: fmak... - fmak 23:42:32 06/25/09 (6)
- RE: fmak... - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 01:17:44 06/26/09 (5)
- RE: fmak...Why are you here? - fmak 02:01:36 06/26/09 (4)
- Thanks also to Teresa for proving my point.! [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 03:22:20 06/26/09 (0)
- RE: fmak...Why are you here? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 02:26:39 06/26/09 (2)
- RE: fmak...Why are you here? - fmak 03:21:48 06/26/09 (1)
- RE: fmak...Why are you here? - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 03:27:46 06/26/09 (0)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - rich121 09:25:39 06/23/09 (4)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - fmak 09:42:05 06/23/09 (3)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - rich121 09:55:35 06/23/09 (2)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 17:47:32 06/25/09 (0)
- Rick I followed this whole thread and fmak who has credibility and is totally correct. - Analog and DSD lover 16:27:20 06/25/09 (0)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 09:02:00 06/23/09 (2)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - fmak 09:15:37 06/23/09 (1)
- Er, about half past three..... :0) [nt] - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:14:50 06/23/09 (0)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - racerguy 12:40:42 06/22/09 (10)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:19:17 06/22/09 (9)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - racerguy 14:54:50 06/22/09 (8)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 23:33:51 06/22/09 (7)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - racerguy 07:27:01 06/23/09 (6)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:13:16 06/23/09 (5)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - racerguy 11:47:10 06/23/09 (4)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:13:25 06/23/09 (2)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - racerguy 14:24:48 06/23/09 (1)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 23:35:30 06/23/09 (0)
- The Ayre CX-7e and 5xe - Robert C. Lang 12:58:59 06/23/09 (0)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - Allen Wright 11:58:55 06/22/09 (0)
Follow Ups
- Gone again? - Wendell Narrod 06/25/0914:51:23 06/25/09 (1)
- Hopefully. nt - navman 14:58:46 06/25/09 (0)