In Reply to: RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback posted by Charlez on June 24, 2009 at 23:48:34:
"(20/24-bit CD recordings or remasters)"
Marketing hype.
These products are all 16 bits. It may be beneficial to use higher resolution in the production process to avoid cumulative degradation, but the result still has no more than 16 bit resolution. If lower resolution is used in the production process it is likely that the end product will have significantly less than 16 bit resolution. So in this sense, the process is valuable. However, this doesn't make the resulting recordings 20 or 24 bits.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - Tony Lauck 06/25/0911:26:15 06/25/09 (9)
- Who cares... - rich121 23:02:57 06/25/09 (8)
- RE: Who cares... - Tony Lauck 07:43:58 06/26/09 (7)
- I think the main reason that RBCD has had an extended life - navman 08:58:23 06/26/09 (5)
- RE: I think the main reason that RBCD has had an extended life - Tony Lauck 12:12:22 06/26/09 (4)
- RE: I think the main reason that RBCD has had an extended life - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:26:59 06/26/09 (2)
- RE: I think the main reason that RBCD has had an extended life - Tony Lauck 14:11:35 06/26/09 (1)
- RE: I think the main reason that RBCD has had an extended life - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 14:24:39 06/26/09 (0)
- RE: Also one good sign imho - navman 12:53:28 06/26/09 (0)
- RE: Who cares... - fmak 08:27:42 06/26/09 (0)