In Reply to: RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback posted by racerguy on June 22, 2009 at 12:40:42:
"You need to provide proof. List every SACD player, and then detail how you tested each one."
That's why I said 'in general' and also qualified it with 'what I would say' dude.
I would also say that if any SACD player was better with CD than it was with SACD, why would anyone buy SACDs to play on it!
Today is a gift - that's why it's called the Present.
Best Regards,
Chris Redmond.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 06/22/0914:19:17 06/22/09 (9)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - racerguy 14:54:50 06/22/09 (8)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 23:33:51 06/22/09 (7)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - racerguy 07:27:01 06/23/09 (6)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 08:13:16 06/23/09 (5)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - racerguy 11:47:10 06/23/09 (4)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 13:13:25 06/23/09 (2)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - racerguy 14:24:48 06/23/09 (1)
- RE: Comparison of CD, SHM-CD, and SACD playback - chris.redmond2@bushinternet.com 23:35:30 06/23/09 (0)
- The Ayre CX-7e and 5xe - Robert C. Lang 12:58:59 06/23/09 (0)