Home Hi-Rez Highway

New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.

From Mr.Hirsch's esteemed publication comes the answer:

Even-order harmonic distortion.

At least, this was what everyone's favorite mag, Stereo Review said around 1994-5(?) in a big article about exactly this subject (analog vs. digital). This was also the same reason--partly--that simple tube designs sound so "pleasant". The latter is well known, no SR fact.

Maybe my lowly mid-west education is affecting me here, but hi-rez from vinyl? Just don't believe it: a huge--relatively speaking--synthetic jewel crashing and shoving its way through nearly-microscopic-sized soft plastic grooves. ( Maybe the FIRST time, but on subsequent playings????). Hard to believe.

Yea, yea, I have experience with vinyl--I own a Technics (what else!?) SL-D20 tt for 18 years and do like the sound of vinyl. And no, I am not sucking up here just to keep everyone happy. (At the risk of sounding like a Technics "schill", Technics is one of the few receiver manufacturers to retain phono inputs on all their receivers except their cheapest HT model. What does this mean? I don't know exactly, but to me, it makes them a kewwwwwl mid-fi audio company.)

Personally, I think vinyl is also good at covering up master recording artifacts to make the final product sound better, whereas digital reveals everything, good AND bad. Just like going from Bose to a pair of B&W's; those once "nice" sounding recordings now sound scratchy, hissy, tape edits reveal themselves, etc.

Digital "breaks up" music, sure. But how is that worse than analog adding hiss, wow & flutter, etc., etc. to the music? Analog may be equivalent to a dirty mirror as remarked below, but those spots of dirt and haze can ALSO cover up pieces of the music, correct?




This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Parts Connexion  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.