|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
|
|
Hi-Rez Highway New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology. |
|
In Reply to: Re: I thought Jennifer Crock... posted by mikel on December 9, 2001 at 20:59:24:
My most recent comparisons go like this. On a friend's system I've cued up the 45 of Kind of Blue and A/B'ed it with the SACD version. Likewise with the 33 of Stardust. I actually preferred the vinyl of KoB but my friend had no preference--and we both had no preference on Stardust. I know what you mean about it coming alive--I also heard a little more warmth and realism from vinyl in the midrange. But SACD has slight advantages on top and on bottom in terms of precision.There are differences, so maybe the idea that digital has "caught up" only applies to my enjoyment. Except that SACD is the highest quality digital we are likely to get for a long time. And this goes back to what I said about converting music to 1's and 0's. Vinyl will always have that "head start" no matter what the sampling.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I thought Jennifer Crock... - Jazz Inmate 12/9/0121:44:33 12/9/01 (8)
- i think maybe we are both right..... - mikel 05:31:33 12/10/01 (6)
- I've recently had a similar experience, mikel - Dr. Audio 08:09:44 12/10/01 (1)
- Re: I've recently had a similar experience, mikel - mikel 18:51:27 12/10/01 (0)
- What about for 99.999999% of record players, though? - Skeptic 07:10:54 12/10/01 (3)
- Re: What about for 99.999999% of record players, though? - mikel 07:30:05 12/10/01 (2)
- Re: What about for 99.999999% of record players, though? - Double Trouble 18:21:18 12/10/01 (1)
- Re: What about for 99.999999% of record players, though? - mikel 19:02:45 12/10/01 (0)
- Wait until you put a Super Clock in your SCD-1! - Audiocrazed 02:10:20 12/10/01 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
