In Reply to: Emm Dac 6e/DCC2 versus new Signature version posted by nevillekapadia on May 1, 2006 at 03:03:36:
My take on this whole Emm thing:1) On SACD: absolutely the best source you will ever experience. Sets a benchmark for all audio sources. Every audiophile should listen to this just to experiece what is possible in audio playback. It is that good.
2) On CD: not even close to SACD playback. In fact, very disapointing. Too forward, too bright - too much of everything.
And this, folks, is why there is so much Emm gear on Audiogon.
Comparisons were made between the Emm system with the Wadia 861SE and the Esoteric X03 (not the 01). On CD only, the Emm was dead last.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Emm Dac 6e/DCC2 versus new Signature version - Terry 05/1/0614:56:02 05/1/06 (10)
- Re: Emm Dac 6e/DCC2 versus new Signature version - classe 10:58:20 05/5/06 (0)
- Re: Emm Dac 6e/DCC2 versus new Signature version - Bill K 15:56:52 05/1/06 (8)
- i kinda like the EMM on redbook...... - mikel 20:27:27 05/1/06 (2)
- Re: i kinda like the EMM on redbook...... - Thom Y 07:50:52 05/2/06 (0)
- Given the obvious controversy could you please repost your Audiogon comments? - Pacman 06:03:55 05/2/06 (0)
- No playback problems here - Robert C. Lang 19:59:56 05/1/06 (2)
- Re: No playback problems here - nevillekapadia 01:27:09 05/2/06 (0)
- I had problems - Cousin Billy 18:24:27 05/4/06 (0)
- Re: Emm Dac 6e/DCC2 versus new Signature version - 24phun 19:32:04 05/1/06 (1)
- Racerguy has an Ayre - Pacman 10:58:00 05/2/06 (0)