In Reply to: RE: Copy Protection? posted by Fitzcaraldo215 on September 7, 2017 at 12:38:45:
> > I still do not see copy protection as part of the hypothetical MQA DRM scheme. < <
I would suggest that you are not looking very hard. Why would MQA spend tens of thousands in direct costs and hundreds of thousands in indirect cost to patent something they had no intention of ever using?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Copy Protection? - Charles Hansen 09/7/1714:09:34 09/7/17 (5)
- RE: Copy Protection? - Fitzcaraldo215 15:16:13 09/7/17 (4)
- RE: Copy Protection? - Charles Hansen 15:44:21 09/7/17 (3)
- RE: Copy Protection? - Fitzcaraldo215 16:14:37 09/7/17 (2)
- RE: Copy Protection? - rjan 22:56:57 09/7/17 (1)
- RE: Copy Protection? - Fitzcaraldo215 08:44:13 09/8/17 (0)