In Reply to: Copy Protection? posted by Fitzcaraldo215 on September 5, 2017 at 10:36:59:
Copy protection is just one application of digital rights management, which is a broader term. From what I've read, MQA implements a form of DRM by requiring a licensed decoder to access the high resolution content, and using technical measures to try to enforce that requirement. As far as I'm aware, it doesn't provide any features in its present incarnation that would restrict copying of downloaded MQA files.
I think people are worried about DRM for two reasons:
1. Because MQA keeps the hi-res content locked up all the way through the distribution and playback chain up to the licensed decoder, it seems like a platform that could easily have additional DRM features added to it.
2. Several major record labels jumped on the bandwagon suspiciously quickly, and nobody trusts the major record labels. It's reasonable to wonder why a company like Warner would switch from selling hi-res PCM downloads to MQA downloads unless they've been promised DRM.
Another complaint is simply that it's a closed format, so we can't use all of the tools and products out there designed to process PCM. For example, what if you wanted to implement room correction, bass management, or EQ? And what if you buy a bunch of music in MQA format and MQA goes bust?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Copy protection and DRM are not the same thing - Dave_K 09/5/1716:08:10 09/5/17 (16)
- RE: Copy protection and DRM are not the same thing - Fitzcaraldo215 08:46:50 09/6/17 (0)
- RE: Copy protection and DRM are not the same thing - ahendler 17:48:33 09/5/17 (14)
- RE: Copy protection and DRM are not the same thing - Dave_K 00:56:59 09/6/17 (0)
- RE: Copy protection and DRM are not the same thing - Charles Hansen 21:17:51 09/5/17 (12)
- RE: Copy protection and DRM are not the same thing - ahendler 21:29:34 09/5/17 (11)
- RE: Copy protection and DRM are not the same thing - John Atkinson 07:22:22 09/6/17 (10)
- And yet... - Ivan303 12:18:28 09/6/17 (9)
- RE: And yet... - John Atkinson 04:15:24 09/7/17 (8)
- The link you sent me to when I first asked the question talkes of a minimum number of 'dealers'... - Ivan303 08:58:00 09/7/17 (7)
- RE: The link you sent me to when I first asked the question talkes of a minimum number of 'dealers'... - John Atkinson 09:37:09 09/7/17 (6)
- See how easy that was? /n - Ivan303 09:51:21 09/7/17 (5)
- WTF? - Charles Hansen 14:17:33 09/7/17 (4)
- RE: WTF? - John Atkinson 10:47:27 09/9/17 (1)
- I think Ivan303 may be many things, but he's not a troll [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 11:24:23 09/9/17 (0)
- Haven't been told by anyone on Asylum to 'fuck right off' in quite some time... - Ivan303 16:30:36 09/7/17 (1)
- You there! (nt) - Charles Hansen 21:05:11 09/7/17 (0)