In Reply to: A thought on Rich's help in this forum...please respond posted by Harlowe on November 19, 2002 at 18:32:37:
contribution enough, I think.--Jim
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- He's direct, succinct, and unambiguous... - Jim Treanor 11/19/0222:08:25 11/19/02 (11)
- Re: He's direct, succinct, and unambiguous... - monk 23:17:10 11/19/02 (10)
- And mostly plain wrong. {n.t.} - Martin says 02:36:19 11/20/02 (9)
- That remains to be seen {n.t.} - oscar 04:25:43 11/20/02 (8)
- Since Rich uses the present tense . . . - Martin says 04:57:42 11/20/02 (7)
- To be or not to be ? What does *is* mean ? - monk 13:02:50 11/20/02 (0)
- The reader who has paid attention... - Jim Treanor 07:55:33 11/20/02 (0)
- Just take a browse at these constructive posts . . . - Martin says 05:19:28 11/20/02 (4)
- And these . . . - Martin says 05:27:02 11/20/02 (3)
- How much time have you spent . . . - CoffeemanU7 15:58:53 11/21/02 (0)
- Martin, poor baby ... - Dave Pogue 08:36:38 11/20/02 (0)
- Yo, Martin, learn to relax and take Rich's posts with a grain of salt . - oscar 05:47:00 11/20/02 (0)