Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

RE: But maybe a pre/pro would be better than a receiver?

Back around 2000, I'd bought a Marantz pre/pro that was quite good compared to what I'd have at the time. A Belles 150A did the R/L and center with my old Marantz 2270 that had the jumper for the pre and the amp doing the surrounds.

Then, I bought a used VTL 2.5 and eventually a Yamaha receiver for surrounds that also did the auto-setup with EQ and have always done it that way ever after.

I'm surprised that you don't have your basement system integrated for surround.

-Rod


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Schiit Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • RE: But maybe a pre/pro would be better than a receiver? - Rod M 12/16/2219:29:55 12/16/22 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.