Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

Agreed. It does show that many listeners prefer technically "accurate" speakers.

"Accurate" in terms of wide frequency range, flat frequency response on-axis, no huge dips or flares in the off-axis, and low non-linear distortion (such as that caused by driver breakup or buzzy boxes). I can't imagine anyone actually considering these characteristics UNdesirable.

Conducting the listening tests in mono, with a single specimen of each speaker, was a wise decision as it allows the listener to focus exclusively on the tonal qualities of the speaker, not distracted by "imaging" or stereo effects.

Hiding the speakers from sight eliminates the sort of visual bias that often leads people to think the mahogany or walnut-finished speaker sounds "darker" than an identical speaker finished in white oak. The shuffler is a clever method of allowing the listener to hear two or more different speakers in rapid succession, auditory memory being notoriously short.

The tests have yielded useful data about peoples' sonic preferences (at least under these specific, controlled experimental conditions), and some useful performance targets for speaker designers. Guidelines, not dogma.




This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  The Cable Cooker  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.