|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: RE: You haven't missed anything posted by cawson@onetel.com on June 8, 2020 at 05:29:36:
Amir seems to have a fetish for it. That one measure, more than anything else, dictates whether he gives a piece of audio electronics a thumbs up or thumbs down.
His speaker reviews aren't much better. He doesn't make pseudo-anechoic measurements, so his measurements don't correlate well with other sources and I don't really trust them.
He doesn't get into listening impressions much at all, not even bothering to listen to a lot of the gear he "reviews". But I'm not sure any of his fans care what stuff sounds like anyway.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Chasing ultra-low THD+N was discredited back in the 1970s - Dave_K 06/8/2008:36:10 06/8/20 (6)
- Totally agree... - mikem 15:31:32 06/23/20 (0)
- What are "pseudo-anechoic measurements"? - Feanor 09:17:21 06/8/20 (4)
- RE: What are "pseudo-anechoic measurements"? - Dave_K 12:45:32 06/8/20 (1)
- Thanks: interesting & helpful - Feanor 16:53:21 06/8/20 (0)
- RE: What are "pseudo-anechoic measurements"? - rivervalley817 09:29:25 06/8/20 (1)
- Which only means you've got to listen before you decide - Feanor 09:48:44 06/8/20 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
