In Reply to: Who is better? The Beatles or The Rolling Stones? posted by Rod M on April 25, 2020 at 13:27:32:
Yes The WHO is better.
In my mind it's a bad comparison. The Beatles were a boy band trying to be a Blues / Rockabilly band and the Stones were a Blues band trying to be a boy band.
The Beatles eventually evolved into something special then gave it up before they lost their edge. The Stones had good staying power but never had that same creative edge IMO. There are some die hard Stones fans out there for good reason. I personally thought their sound sucked live.
The WHO however was a totally different animal...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Who is better? The Beatles or The Rolling Stones? - Stuben 04/26/2007:14:57 04/26/20 (2)
- RE: Who is better? The Beatles or The Rolling Stones? - regmac 05:49:39 04/27/20 (0)
- RE: " The Beatles were a boy band trying to be a Blues / Rockabilly band and the Stones were a Blues band ... - B. Scarpia 04:19:27 04/27/20 (0)