RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping?

General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - thump 17:37:25 07/17/19 (39)

RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - Story 02:36:10 07/22/19 (0)

RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - Mr_Steady 05:42:19 07/19/19 (3)

RE: marchand - thump 16:24:28 08/11/19 (0)

RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - Davey 07/19/1907:27:14 07/19/19 (1)

Good point, thanks (NT) - Mr_Steady 07:35:44 07/19/19 (0)

RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - neolith 04:46:50 07/19/19 (0)

Line level passives are great - bare 09:06:22 07/18/19 (6)

Not really. - Mr. Dick Hertz 12:02:32 07/18/19 (1)

i meant LINE LEVEL passive crossovers - thump 15:32:53 08/11/19 (0)

I am not so sure................ - Kal Rubinson 11:48:14 07/18/19 (3)

RE: I am not so sure................ - Davey 14:10:17 07/18/19 (2)

then why the love for manley's "massive passive" & gyratecs? - thump 15:41:37 08/11/19 (0)

Agreed. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 17:35:45 07/18/19 (0)

RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - HiOnFi 07:55:31 07/18/19 (0)

RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - Alpha Al 05:49:39 07/18/19 (1)

impedance matching - thump 15:55:18 08/11/19 (0)

Those are pretty simple but................... - Kal Rubinson 19:47:29 07/17/19 (3)

i don't want to DIY - thump 15:57:47 08/11/19 (0)

RE: Those are pretty simple but................... - hahax@verizon.net 20:36:28 07/17/19 (1)

RE: Those are pretty simple but................... - Kal Rubinson 05:56:19 07/18/19 (0)

I have used those in line filters - they work well, - hawkmoon 19:02:52 07/17/19 (2)

first, i need to find a job - thump 15:31:28 08/11/19 (0)

same here - lokie 06:33:41 07/22/19 (0)

RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - OldNuke 18:27:48 07/17/19 (1)

RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - thump 17:42:55 07/24/19 (0)

Not needed - Awe-d-o-file 18:20:43 07/17/19 (6)

RE: speaker vs. line level - thump 17:37:39 07/24/19 (1)

RE: speaker vs. line level - Davey 06:49:23 07/25/19 (0)

the "RCA thing" is a filter, too - mhardy6647 06:08:47 07/18/19 (2)

aka K.I.S.S. (keep it simple stupid) - thump 15:59:40 08/11/19 (0)

RE: the "RCA thing" is a filter, too - Awe-d-o-file 08:14:23 07/18/19 (0)

RE: Not needed - thump 18:36:08 07/17/19 (0)

RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - Mr. Dick Hertz 17:51:53 07/17/19 (6)

RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - thump 18:49:00 07/17/19 (5)

re ported speakers - Bill Way 20:42:41 07/18/19 (4)

RE: re ported speakers - thump 16:16:36 08/11/19 (1)

RE: re ported speakers - Bill Way 07:04:02 08/12/19 (0)

RE: re ported speakers - b.l.zeebub 04:37:39 07/22/19 (1)

RE: re ported speakers - Bill Way 08:04:10 07/22/19 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Why NOT inline passive crossovers for bi-amping? - Davey 07/19/1907:27:14 07/19/19 (1)

Good point, thanks (NT) - Mr_Steady 07:35:44 07/19/19 (0)

Post a Message!