Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

RE: CNBC trashes higher res streaming services

I have no prob.em with their findings. We audiophiles have a different set of criteria. We are critical listeners for detail, dimension, wide frequency response, imaging, etc. I personally listen to several internet radio stations on a regular b.sis. One is at 192. The other at 320kps. B.th would b. classified MP3 quality. I find b.th of them very enjoyab.e. If I listened using good headphones or in a critical mode I might not find them as pleasurab.e?



This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Atma-Sphere Music Systems, Inc.  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • RE: CNBC trashes higher res streaming services - Mike B. 08/6/1608:54:34 08/6/16 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.