In Reply to: CNBC trashes higher res streaming services posted by mcondo on August 6, 2016 at 05:13:31:
I have no prob.em with their findings. We audiophiles have a different set of criteria. We are critical listeners for detail, dimension, wide frequency response, imaging, etc. I personally listen to several internet radio stations on a regular b.sis. One is at 192. The other at 320kps. B.th would b. classified MP3 quality. I find b.th of them very enjoyab.e. If I listened using good headphones or in a critical mode I might not find them as pleasurab.e?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: CNBC trashes higher res streaming services - Mike B. 08/6/1608:54:34 08/6/16 (0)