|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Here is the original AES paper posted by Tony Lauck on January 20, 2016 at 11:30:40:
> > Tell me what you do for a living and try to explain why you shouldn't do
> > it for free.
>
> In case you didn't know it, there are lots of people who have done well
> developing open source software. he best example is Linus Torvalds. In
> the music world there are bands that have done well while not using
> copyright, e.g. The Grateful Dead.
So what. Torvalds get royalties from distributors like Red Hat and from
those who embed Linux in their products. The Grateful Dead were the
highest-paid touring band in the US for many years, so their attitude to
copyright was an adjunct to their primary source of income.
So please answer my question. You don't work for nothing; why should
the engineers at MQA?
> There is nothing unique in MQA to justify special treatment, compared
> to, say, FLAC...
You obviously haven't read the papers on MQA. Get back to me when you
have.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - John Atkinson 01/20/1612:26:04 01/20/16 (1)
- RE: Here is the original AES paper - Tony Lauck 12:52:41 01/20/16 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
