In Reply to: I'll take a stab and say yes. posted by free.ranger on December 1, 2008 at 19:53:26:
Thanks for your scientific explanation. I will take that as a yes! I thought that might be case. Now the next question is whether there is an advantage to leaving the system on continuosly during the break-in period other than having it break in faster.For example do components break-in more effectivley when run continuosly?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I'll take a stab and say yes. - bob24 12/1/0820:01:57 12/1/08 (17)
- RE: I'll take a stab and say yes. - bob24 07:37:13 12/2/08 (0)
- Hardly scientific, but I'll take another stab. Call me Jack the Ripper. - free.ranger 20:06:36 12/1/08 (15)
- RE: Hardly scientific, but I'll take another stab. Call me Jack the Ripper. - bob24 20:14:58 12/1/08 (14)
- RE: Hardly scientific, but I'll take another stab. Call me Jack the Ripper. - siramazing 05:48:55 12/2/08 (0)
- quick hit process - MarkgM 05:34:56 12/2/08 (0)
- If it's been a decade... - rick_m 05:11:55 12/2/08 (0)
- RE: Hardly scientific, but I'll take another stab. Call me Jack the Ripper. - ironbut 20:52:19 12/1/08 (10)
- Huh? - rick_m 05:20:09 12/2/08 (9)
- RE: Huh? - ironbut 17:28:27 12/2/08 (1)
- RE: Huh? - rick_m 18:44:10 12/2/08 (0)
- RE: Huh? - AbeCollins 08:10:36 12/2/08 (6)
- RE: gloves for tubes - Bruce from DC 16:07:32 12/2/08 (1)
- RE: gloves for tubes not necessary, in my opinion - AbeCollins 06:43:27 12/3/08 (0)
- Gloved handling of tubes was routine in the navy. - free.ranger 13:45:59 12/2/08 (1)
- The Navy is all about tradition whether it makes sense in modern times or not. ;-) - AbeCollins 13:49:06 12/2/08 (0)
- RE: Huh? - bob24 08:25:21 12/2/08 (1)
- RE: Huh? - AbeCollins 13:46:53 12/2/08 (0)