|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: How do you manage to be wrong all the time? Even a coin flip is right half the time posted by Analog Scott on June 5, 2008 at 15:45:16:
> > I know the above hypothetical situation is hard to believe, since no audiophile has ever been able to demonstrate that he can hear non-SPL wire differences to witnesses, but then some day a miracle could happen.> >
Now you are just making things up.
We held a Monster blind A/B using customers in "The Good Guys" on a Panasonic boom box one stock and one rewired with monster cable. Every single customer, that's right 100% guessed which one was wired with monster cable. What was the reason for the demonstration, simple Joel Lee's belief that well designed cabling will improve any component no matter how inexpensive it is.
It is really easy to hear the difference between even different gages of lamp cord, the higher the gauge (lower number) the deeper and more pronounced the bass. I would like to know who the hell are these people that cannot hear this and where do they get the weird people that cannot hear?
Music is love,
Mono is not music to my ears.
Give me stereo or give me silence!
Teresa
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Yep he made that up out of the clear blue - Teresa 06/7/0803:23:52 06/7/08 (38)
- You describe a nonsense "test" where Monster Cables play louder than thin cables = ho hum (non-science = nonsense) - Richard BassNut Greene 11:14:34 06/7/08 (36)
- FTI the Monster cable had more bass at low, medium and high levels, at any level, do you understand? - Teresa 16:35:13 06/7/08 (22)
- Only an imbecile would respond to a post about a "test" done with a Panasonic boombox - Richard BassNut Greene 12:29:19 06/8/08 (21)
- The Panasonic boombox's had detachable speakers one rewired with Monster one with the original cables. - Teresa 18:24:20 06/8/08 (20)
- Reality supported by objective proof is my goal -- your goal is believing everything sounds different ... - Richard BassNut Greene 08:27:25 06/9/08 (19)
- You really are insane! How do you explain each line of cable having it's own "house" sound - Teresa 09:54:01 06/9/08 (12)
- Overactive audiophile imaginations is the most logical explanation - Richard BassNut Greene 16:01:57 06/9/08 (11)
- If you refer to the right tests then coloration of different brands of speaker cables is easily verified blind - Teresa 18:11:04 06/9/08 (10)
- I don't believe they could, Teresa. - robert young 19:06:20 06/9/08 (9)
- "Many cables DO sound the same" - Richard BassNut Greene 07:32:08 06/10/08 (8)
- Clearly you didn't read or comprehend my post. - robert young 07:47:57 06/10/08 (7)
- Robert I never claimed to have heard everything, Everything I've heard sounds different, usually strikingly so - Teresa 18:44:08 06/10/08 (3)
- You two are extremists - robert young 18:48:57 06/10/08 (2)
- That is not extreme but in 40 years of listening I have never heard two products that sound the same. - Teresa 19:22:34 06/10/08 (1)
- The JREF challenge was made for you. - robert young 19:29:42 06/10/08 (0)
- teresa and I were hired by the Alert Moderators to entertain you - Richard BassNut Greene 08:00:45 06/10/08 (2)
- RE: teresa and I were hired by the Alert Moderators to entertain you - Analog Scott 08:55:20 06/10/08 (0)
- You're learning, Richard. - robert young 08:18:07 06/10/08 (0)
- "Reality supported by objective proof is my goal " OK show us.. - Analog Scott 09:06:32 06/9/08 (5)
- I never said all cables sound the same -- I merely noted there was no proof any two sounded different - Richard BassNut Greene 09:21:56 06/9/08 (4)
- Likewise there is no proof that some cables don't sound different - Analog Scott 09:34:23 06/9/08 (3)
- There is no proof you have three legs either - Richard BassNut Greene 16:07:01 06/9/08 (2)
- More strawmen, RG. Makes me wonder... - robert young 18:57:01 06/9/08 (0)
- Actually there is plenty. - Analog Scott 17:42:14 06/9/08 (0)
- Dude you are a poster boy for objectivist B.S. - Analog Scott 12:18:06 06/7/08 (12)
- Greenhill went much too far to create audible wire differences -- Teresa has never done any test - Richard BassNut Greene 12:45:16 06/8/08 (9)
- WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG and well JUST TOTALLY WRONG! - Teresa 18:35:52 06/8/08 (0)
- Dude you are so predictable - Analog Scott 13:11:44 06/8/08 (7)
- There were no blind tests - Richard BassNut Greene 08:43:13 06/9/08 (6)
- Dude you can repeat your nonsense all you want - Analog Scott 08:59:21 06/9/08 (5)
- Hearing that thick boombox speaker cables are LOUDER than thin cables means nothing -- that's no test - Richard BassNut Greene 16:08:45 06/9/08 (4)
- You didn't read well the Monster rep even turned the Monster equipped down so the non-Monster would be louder. - Teresa 18:28:50 06/9/08 (3)
- Test methodology for your beloved boombox wire "test" is the worst I've read in 40 years as an audiophile - Richard BassNut Greene 07:52:59 06/10/08 (2)
- The whole purpose of Monster's Boombox test is to PROVE no matter how cheap your stereo is EXCELLENT - Teresa 19:05:00 06/10/08 (1)
- Teresa sez: "cable makes a huge difference" ... while WireNut Jon Risch sez: 'cable differences are subtle' ????????? - Richard BassNut Greene 09:15:16 06/11/08 (0)
- RE: Dude you are a poster boy for objectivist B.S. - middleground 07:20:23 06/8/08 (1)
- Sure you are. N/T - carcass93 07:56:34 06/10/08 (0)
- Nope, never happened, not possible.... - Analog Scott 11:05:15 06/7/08 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]