In Reply to: My response. posted by jsm on October 26, 2005 at 19:15:19:
> Since any response I would like to make would look like criticism of
> you and your magazine, and since I don't think that is appropriate for
> AA, I won't say anything more.
Perhaps you don't have the courage of your convictions, jsm? If you have
facts that contradict what I wrote, you should share them. Randi's
duplicity in his dealings with me is documented on his own website,
for example. Wh, then, do you apparently doubt what I wrote?
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: My response. - John Atkinson 10/27/0504:12:25 10/27/05 (6)
- I'm sorry that you missed my point. - jsm 16:24:48 10/27/05 (5)
- John Atkinson makes the point elsewhere... - Wellfed 17:36:25 10/27/05 (4)
- My take on the answer to your question. It's a matter of perspective. - jsm 18:21:49 10/27/05 (3)
- I call them "lies" because, well, they are lies... - Wellfed 19:00:11 10/27/05 (2)
- Do I feel science is under attack? Without question!! - jsm 14:31:34 10/28/05 (1)
- Are you saying science itself is under attack... - Wellfed 17:06:44 10/28/05 (0)