In Reply to: Who cares? posted by Rob Doorack on October 25, 2005 at 11:08:52:
My experience as a Randi Challenge applicant proves unequivocally that they are all show and no substance. This can be documented rather easily if you would happen to know of any writer, audio, or otherwise, interested in exposing their farce.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I'm still waiting for Randi to stick a sock in it.... - Wellfed 10/25/0512:29:38 10/25/05 (16)
- The BBC took up Randi on his challenge for proving homeopathy - Soundmind 13:34:23 10/25/05 (15)
- How many ... - bjh 17:39:04 10/25/05 (3)
- Re: How many ... - morricab 08:47:22 10/27/05 (2)
- Re: How many ... - bjh 12:39:41 10/27/05 (1)
- Re: How many ... - morricab 05:48:48 10/28/05 (0)
- Are you saying that the Challenge was a legitimate enterprise at one time?... - Wellfed 15:03:16 10/25/05 (4)
- http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2002/homeopathy.shtml - theaudiohobby 18:41:16 10/25/05 (0)
- The double blind test was supervised by the most respected scientists in Britain - Soundmind 17:09:00 10/25/05 (2)
- http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2002/homeopathy.shtml - theaudiohobby 18:40:37 10/25/05 (0)
- Re: The double blind test was supervised by the most respected scientists in Britain - The Bored 18:14:42 10/25/05 (1)
- Wait a minute here... - mkuller 14:39:38 10/25/05 (5)
- No, he proved that it doesn't work, homeopathy is a complete fraud nt - Soundmind 17:09:57 10/25/05 (3)
- No, he didn't prove that it doesn't work - David Aiken 14:41:55 10/26/05 (0)
- Randi and homeopathy - John N 12:24:43 10/26/05 (0)
- Sorry, but... - mkuller 09:39:17 10/26/05 (1)
- I'm pretty sure James Randi would be skeptical of homeopathy... - Wellfed 15:06:03 10/25/05 (0)