In Reply to: Thanks, that was what I very clearly implied (nt) posted by can on January 27, 2005 at 16:11:58:
hey, can, you called me a "fool" on a public forum. if you were referring to my "nemesis" in the above scenario, then I apologize to you. however, it's certainly UNCLEAR to whom you were referring especially after Bruce just told ME that I broke the law in seeking - and achieving - prompt resolution.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Thanks, that was what I very clearly implied (nt) - Ian Mackenzie 01/28/0507:20:02 01/28/05 (2)
- Re: Thanks, that was what I very clearly implied (nt) - can 10:41:54 01/28/05 (1)
- should have typed conditional, not unconditional (nt) - can 10:43:23 01/28/05 (0)