In Reply to: What does dynamic compression sound like posted by amdan on August 16, 2010 at 01:33:08:
It sounds like most modern pop recordings haha
With being able to compare to a “without” version, it is more problematic. The main object in compression is to raise the average loudness.
This began during the early TV era when the FCC and the electronics limited the depth of modulation that was possible so the people who made commercials compressed the signals so that “their” product could be broadcast with a higher average level, making them seem louder than the less compressed programs.
This is a process of making the quietest sounds much louder while not raising the loud ones over a given level, thus the difference between the loudest and softest is much less.
Now days, it seems to be the record promoters (not recording engineers) who are behind it, the goal being "having the loudest CD".
Your easiest path would be to use audacity (free) or other editing program and examine the intensity vs time display, a highly compressed signal is obvious. Do a google search for “loudness wars” and examine some of the results.
Best,
Tom Danley
Danley Sound Labs
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: What does dynamic compression sound like - tomservo 08/16/1006:55:44 08/16/10 (20)
- RE: What does dynamic compression sound like - pictureguy 22:43:18 08/17/10 (0)
- RE: What does dynamic compression sound like - amdan 21:50:00 08/16/10 (18)
- It's not that simple… - David Aiken 00:26:22 08/17/10 (17)
- RE: It's not that simple… - josh358 14:14:54 08/18/10 (7)
- RE: It's not that simple… - David Aiken 15:22:46 08/18/10 (6)
- RE: It's not that simple… - josh358 16:33:49 08/18/10 (5)
- RE: It's not that simple… - David Aiken 17:54:38 08/18/10 (4)
- RE: It's not that simple… - josh358 16:56:27 08/19/10 (3)
- RE: It's not that simple… - David Aiken 13:26:37 08/20/10 (2)
- RE: It's not that simple… - josh358 11:14:58 08/22/10 (1)
- RE: It's not that simple… - David Aiken 13:40:40 08/23/10 (0)
- RE: It's not that simple… - josh358 16:56:17 08/30/10 (0)
- RE: It's not that simple… - pictureguy 13:44:24 08/18/10 (4)
- RE: It's not that simple… - David Aiken 15:37:26 08/18/10 (0)
- RE: It's not that simple… - josh358 14:20:43 08/18/10 (2)
- RE: It's not that simple… - pictureguy 21:50:07 08/18/10 (1)
- RE: It's not that simple… - josh358 14:45:08 08/19/10 (0)
- Thanks. Good point about the question. - amdan 00:41:54 08/17/10 (3)
- An Example - Dave Garretson 05:47:24 08/17/10 (2)
- This recording is a perfect example..... - kootenay 17:33:55 08/17/10 (1)
- RE: This recording is a perfect example..... - gymwear5@hotmail.com 20:54:37 08/17/10 (0)