|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: The Lure that Motivated Improved Sound Reproduction..... posted by Todd Krieger on December 10, 2006 at 12:48:25:
and, as you can see, you hooked the fish. FYI, there's a UNIVERSE of folks out there (who attend live concerts as reference) who have achieved "you are there" audio quality using digital sources. My bias, if you want to call it that, is to use tubes, anti-jitter, dipole speakers and a few tweaks to make it so. By all means, have your preference. By by now means, think it is "right...absolutely".P.S. -- Your "profound observation" simply isn't true. The real reason is that audiphile reproduction simply is not a high priority amongst the many sources of entertainment that are out there now. Video and computers have taken over. Add to that the research, trial-and-error and outright expense of achieving that last ounce of audiophile nirvana and you have a slam dunk for why the audience is declining. Blame on "digital" if you want -- Teresa will have your baby!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Your posts are starting to sound like Teresa's bud... - SE 12/11/0607:08:44 12/11/06 (3)
- I Think the Question is.... - Todd Krieger 10:14:54 12/11/06 (1)
- Well... - SE 10:50:32 12/11/06 (0)
- Re: nice one, so funny -nt - theaudiohobby 07:30:06 12/11/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
