"The problems would seem to be h somewhere in the analog domain." HUH? - garth

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - CD and vinyl record polarity - georgelouis 03:06:03 05/21/06 (53)

Get over it, the sad truth is.... - Jon Risch 20:04:29 05/21/06 (18)

"Human hearing is not sensitive to absolute phase ... absolute phase can be audible, but it is (generally) irrelevant - Richard BassNut Greene 10:14:29 05/22/06 (5)

Oh! Well, that settles it, then. nt - markrohr 02:53:53 05/23/06 (0)

Re: "Human hearing is not sensitive to absolute phase ... absolute phase can be audible, but it is (generally) irrelevan - tecnofossil 16:50:49 05/22/06 (1)

"I'd be careful of citing his work as the final word....." No kidding. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:44:15 05/23/06 (0)

Moot point - Jon Risch 10:23:45 05/22/06 (1)

None of my points are moot points -- So now you're an attorney too! - Richard BassNut Greene 17:19:30 05/22/06 (0)

All very true, Jon, with this IMPORTANT exception: - clarkjohnsen 09:10:12 05/22/06 (8)

Let's rename 'absolute' to 'final.' Everything upstream is 'relative,' literally...-nt- - cdb 18:00:54 05/22/06 (1)

Excellent observation... betrays a full understanding... try telling it to tout le monde, though... nt - clarkjohnsen 08:34:32 05/23/06 (0)

Sorry Clark - Jon Risch 10:29:36 05/22/06 (5)

You labor under a delusion, sir -- perhaps your only one. - clarkjohnsen 10:44:54 05/22/06 (4)

"I've banished that notion in the message referenced below." CJ - garth 12:40:24 05/22/06 (3)

And where in that paper do you read about inscription of acoustic polarity onto any media? - clarkjohnsen 15:33:48 05/22/06 (2)

So tell us how. Oh, you can't either? Thought so. - garth 00:34:41 05/23/06 (1)

Huh! And you accuse *me* of being condescending. - clarkjohnsen 08:42:33 05/23/06 (0)

Re: Get over it, the sad truth is.... - Doc Gaw 05:46:53 05/22/06 (2)

"Finally someone who understands absolute polarity." I beg your pardon! - clarkjohnsen 09:01:13 05/22/06 (0)

Make things EASY for yourself... - SE 07:46:39 05/22/06 (0)

Perhaps obtaining a certain level of absolute polarity advances - musetap 12:49:20 05/21/06 (2)

Or not ..... but I would not be inclined to not wholy disagree but not entirely. - garth 12:57:35 05/21/06 (1)

Whoa! *Quintuple negative!* Well done, sir! ;-) nt - markrohr 17:01:46 05/21/06 (0)

Are you the same Mr. Louis who tried selling that RelaityCheck? - Caymus 10:27:07 05/21/06 (14)

Re: Are you the same Mr. Louis who tried selling that RelaityCheck? - georgelouis 11:42:08 05/21/06 (13)

"the sadist truth" - Rob Doorack 19:43:14 05/21/06 (4)

Re: "the sadist truth" - georgelouis 21:08:48 05/21/06 (3)

Re: "the sadist truth" - Rob Doorack 07:00:42 05/22/06 (2)

Indeed, if one were to balance the the saddest aspects - musetap 12:03:13 05/22/06 (1)

yup. hallmarks of crankery (nt) - CD 15:19:51 05/22/06 (0)

"Those two factors all by themselves trump everything else" - tunenut 14:44:29 05/21/06 (0)

I wonder why 'normal' people think we audiophiles are nuts? Hmmm......./nt/ - powermatic 13:09:33 05/21/06 (3)

Because we're here reading posts from George???? (-: (guilty) (wot) - garth 13:41:21 05/21/06 (2)

BTW garth: shoot me an e-mail sometime. /nt/ - powermatic 20:00:16 05/21/06 (0)

touche' :-) /nt/ - powermatic 17:01:00 05/21/06 (0)

Re: Are you the same Mr. Louis who tried selling that RelaityCheck? - georgelouis 11:58:09 05/21/06 (2)

George, why not just read through your first post before sending it? - garth 12:55:32 05/21/06 (1)

Too practical? Too logical? Too normal? Too sane? Too tooo..shay? NT.... - musetap 13:28:32 05/21/06 (0)

Stop pulling our leg... - budget fi 08:38:40 05/21/06 (0)

"The problems would seem to be h somewhere in the analog domain." HUH? - garth 05/21/0603:30:01 05/21/06 (14)

Re: "The problems would seem to be h somewhere in the analog domain." HUH? - georgelouis 10:33:41 05/21/06 (13)

As I had posted earlier - unclestu52 13:48:34 05/21/06 (4)

Re: As I had posted earlier - georgelouis 14:55:37 05/21/06 (0)

Stu, do you mean.... - garth 14:11:36 05/21/06 (2)

Yes: - unclestu52 14:46:08 05/21/06 (1)

Thanks! Do you think the "rip to disc" "inversion" is a software - garth 14:52:36 05/21/06 (0)

The ADC is just one step. - garth 13:39:16 05/21/06 (7)

Re: The ADC is just one step. - georgelouis 15:26:51 05/21/06 (6)

What the hell are you rambling on about? - garth 23:43:25 05/21/06 (5)

"Do you think you are the second coming of Clark J.?" Who himself was... - clarkjohnsen 10:26:08 05/22/06 (2)

Perhaps each incarnation gets better? - garth 12:43:38 05/22/06 (1)

But does the absolute polarity change from incarnation to incarnation?...N/T - musetap 23:12:23 05/22/06 (0)

Re: What the hell are you rambling on about? - georgelouis 00:20:23 05/22/06 (1)

"first day of an undergrate class" ? - garth 00:43:08 05/22/06 (0)

Follow Ups

"The problems would seem to be h somewhere in the analog domain." HUH? - garth 05/21/0603:30:01 05/21/06 (14)

Re: "The problems would seem to be h somewhere in the analog domain." HUH? - georgelouis 10:33:41 05/21/06 (13)

As I had posted earlier - unclestu52 13:48:34 05/21/06 (4)

Re: As I had posted earlier - georgelouis 14:55:37 05/21/06 (0)

Stu, do you mean.... - garth 14:11:36 05/21/06 (2)

Yes: - unclestu52 14:46:08 05/21/06 (1)

Thanks! Do you think the "rip to disc" "inversion" is a software - garth 14:52:36 05/21/06 (0)

The ADC is just one step. - garth 13:39:16 05/21/06 (7)

Re: The ADC is just one step. - georgelouis 15:26:51 05/21/06 (6)

What the hell are you rambling on about? - garth 23:43:25 05/21/06 (5)

"Do you think you are the second coming of Clark J.?" Who himself was... - clarkjohnsen 10:26:08 05/22/06 (2)

Perhaps each incarnation gets better? - garth 12:43:38 05/22/06 (1)

But does the absolute polarity change from incarnation to incarnation?...N/T - musetap 23:12:23 05/22/06 (0)

Re: What the hell are you rambling on about? - georgelouis 00:20:23 05/22/06 (1)

"first day of an undergrate class" ? - garth 00:43:08 05/22/06 (0)