In Reply to: That's not really how it works posted by Geoffkait on October 25, 2024 at 05:10:51:
"We now know" ..... are you using the royal 'we' here?
I would agree that our explanation of hearing, from an audiophile perspective, is not complete. For example, trawl through "The Psychology of Hearing" by C.B. Moore(*) and you'll learn a lot about what sound is, what it does to the ear and how it is perceived but it won't tell you what makes one system/set-up/component sound preferable to another. In fact, the section on the requirements for hi-fi reproduction lists some fairly unchallenging specs.
* Why that text book? In going through some old file boxes I found pages I'd clipped out of old hi-fi magazines that I thought worth keeping. One of them was a letters page from HFN&RR in the mid-eighties and contained a letter from said C.B. Moore taking exception to something Bob Stuart (then of Meridian) had written about hearing acuity. Back then, Bob Stuart was highly regarded, now, post-MQA, he is not. So, Prof. Moore was ahead of his time in that aspect so is probably worth listening to (sic).
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Correct, your ears are only there to hold your glasses on - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 10/25/2409:52:42 10/25/24 (5)
- "We" are the ones who know, then there's the rest of you. Nt - Geoffkait 11:39:55 10/25/24 (0)
- Everyone follows different sheep. No offense to you personally. Nt - Geoffkait 11:28:43 10/25/24 (3)
- Mrs. Thatcher once said that being criticized by one or her oponents was like - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 17:10:33 10/25/24 (2)
- Whoa! Everyone's favorite old bag. Nt - Geoffkait 06:48:22 10/26/24 (1)
- She's definitely not my favorite old bag. - peppy m. 08:03:08 10/26/24 (0)