In Reply to: RE: Sub Woofers - ported vs Sealed? Active or not? posted by hahax@verizon.net on August 1, 2024 at 20:34:22:
Nothing else comes close if infrasonics extension is the goal. It gets louder and VERY efficient as it goes lower, dangerously so. Few people have the physical layout required
True horn sub is best overall with a multi driver Infinite Baffle not far behind. Few people have the physical layout required
The method to achieve a subsonic low Q is almost unimportant, but sealed technically is easier to achieve, but in reality needs multiples and aggressive transfer function to meet goals
Vast majority of people's listening rooms are well served by a large-ish format low excursion sealed alignment, but most offerings selected are small format high excursion sealed. Often not the low Q offering sought but offers high output. So then a low Q reflex will be a better trade off.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Rotary then horn then infinite baffle then open baffle then Low Q direct - Edp 08/2/2409:13:53 08/2/24 (6)
- RE: Rotary then horn then infinite baffle then open baffle then Low Q direct - tomservo 08:05:10 08/3/24 (3)
- Well aware of the Tapped Horn - Edp 14:32:35 08/3/24 (0)
- "Input Power Ratings" - Craiger56 10:55:44 08/3/24 (1)
- RE: "Input Power Ratings" - tomservo 11:51:28 08/3/24 (0)
- RE: Rotary then horn then infinite baffle then open baffle then Low Q direct - hahax@verizon.net 20:48:47 08/2/24 (0)
- RE: Rotary then horn then infinite baffle then open baffle then Low Q direct - highendfan 17:43:47 08/2/24 (0)