|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
|
|
General Asylum General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories. |
|
In Reply to: Re: If you want to call an upper midrange peak, rolled of highs, muddy peaked upper bass, and reduced low bass 'bigger'. posted by Soundmind on August 11, 2006 at 18:51:09:
I don't read negativity or antagonism in the original post. Apparently you do, because you seem to have a "cause" and see it, i.e., the original post, as a challenge to your point of view. Me, I'm just a happy idiot who employs tubes (preamp), solid state (amp), and hybrid (SACD/CD player) because that particular combination sounds right to me and gives me the greatest pleasure. I don't care what you use to accomplish the same goal nor would I be presumptuous enough to tell you what is right or wrong.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: If you want to call an upper midrange peak, rolled of highs, muddy peaked upper bass, and reduced low bass 'bigger'. - keldasdad 08/11/0619:50:41 08/11/06 (2)
- Re: If you want to call an upper midrange peak, rolled of highs, muddy peaked upper bass, and reduced low bass 'bigger'. - Soundmind 00:54:47 08/12/06 (1)
- Re: If you want to call an upper midrange peak, rolled of highs, muddy peaked upper bass, and reduced low bass 'bigger'. - keldasdad 05:05:20 08/12/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
