Home General Asylum

General audio topics that don't fit into specific categories.

"bigger in the sense of fleshier"?. That makes good sense!

The word 'bigger' in describing tube sound is a bit awkward, but the word 'fleshier' hits the mark. I switched out amps recently, going from a Yamaha M-85 to an Audio Research VT130. The contrast in sound was dramatic; the Yamaha may have had loudness and raw power, but it sounded a bit flat and uninspiring. Switch in the ARC VT130 and wow! Suddenly the music had 3 dimensional depth and an excellent soundstage; individual instruments stood out clearly in my living room space. The 'flesh' metaphor you used is very good; tube sound seems to impart a dimensionality or 'body' to sound that is persuasive to our ears.

However, we may be way off the mark in comparing budget solid state gear (Yamaha & NAD) with top quality tube gear (CJ and ARC). Do the same listening tests, but this time use Pass Labs or Plinius amps. Result? Our "tubes sound better" hypothesis will be less persuasive. My personal opinion? I think you are correct; tube gear 'fleshes-out' the music better than any solid state gear that I've heard.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.